ChakshuGautam · November 10, 2025 04:30
diff --git a/leap-review-human-friendly.json b/leap-review-human-friendly.json
 {
  "documentTitle": "LEAP - Pragati",
  "overallAssessment": {
    "mahaVakya_UserCentricity": "The document is rich with data but struggles with user-centricity. A +1 manager cannot quickly understand progress because the core structure is a list of updates rather than a clear 'Goal vs. Actual' format for each initiative. The extremely long lines (over 80 lines exceed 100 characters) make it very difficult to scan. For instance, the line on 'Cattle Trade Fair (CTF)' is 270 characters long, containing a link, a proposal, and a connection to another fair, which is too much information for one line. While evidence is linked, the lack of a clear, scannable structure is the biggest barrier to quick comprehension.",
    "panchSutra1_ClearObjective": "The strategic objectives are stated at a high level in the 'ToC Bucket' and 'Mapped MCM' lines. However, the specific, measurable goal for each individual initiative is often buried within the progress update or absent altogether. For example, in '- **Go-Palan Yojana (GPY):** As on Sept 2, **65K** applications against a saturation target of **73K**...', the target is mentioned but not framed as a goal upfront, making it harder to evaluate performance at a glance.",
    "panchSutra2_OverallFlow": "The overall flow is weak because it doesn't use the 'dot' structure to tell a story. The main bullets are section headers ('ToC Bucket'), not progress points. Reading these headers alone provides no information about what was achieved. The real initiatives are introduced with bolded text within dashes (e.g., '- **Insurance:**...'), creating a flat, list-like structure that is hard to follow. A manager has to read every line to piece together the progress story.",
    "panchSutra3_DashSupport": "The parent-child relationship between dots and dashes is not followed. The document uses section headers, and then all subsequent lines are dashes. Many dashes introduce entirely new topics instead of supporting a single parent idea. For example, under the first 'ToC Bucket', the document updates on 'Go-Palan Yojana' and then introduces a new initiative, '**Cattle Trade Fair (CTF)**', as another dash. This should be a separate main dot, not a dash within the same stream of thought.",
    "panchSutra4_Quantification": "Quantification is a significant strength of this document; nearly every point is backed by numbers. However, the presentation could be more effective. Targets are sometimes missing, and the 'X/Y' format is not used consistently. For example, '- For GPY, **10747** Go-aheads have been issued with subsidy released for **2606** completed projects' gives two numbers but doesn't state the targets for each, making it hard to assess if this is good or bad progress. Also, number formatting (commas) is consistently missed for numbers >999.",
    "panchSutra5_OnePageLimit": "The document severely violates the principle of brevity and scannability due to excessive line lengths. With 88 lines flagged as being too long, it's highly unlikely this fits on a single, readable page. The content needs to be aggressively edited and broken down into hierarchical points to improve conciseness and adhere to the single-line constraint.",
    "evidenceLinks": "The author has done a good job of including links to supporting evidence for many claims. This is a major strength. However, the format uses embedded markdown hyperlinks like '[text](url)' instead of the standard, less intrusive '(>>)' pattern. This makes the lines longer and more cluttered. For example, the line on 'Unified Payment Layer' is 209 characters long, with the link text itself contributing to the length."
  },
  "tacticalFormattingIssues": [
    {
      "type": "TF1-LineLength",
      "location": "- **Cattle Trade Fair (CTF)**: [CTF](https://...) is being proposed as a forum to connect farmers with private traders...",
      "issue": "Line is 270 characters long, which is more than double the recommended maximum length. It contains multiple ideas.",
      "suggestion": "Break this into a main dot for the initiative and supporting dashes for the proposal, target audience, and pilot plan."
    },
    {
      "type": "TF1-LineLength",
      "location": "- **Insurance:** For FY 25-26, target of [4.5 Lakh cattle](https://...) covering MKY and non-MKY animals, set with the budget of **₹ 53.7 Cr.**",
      "issue": "Line is 253 characters long. It contains the target, scope, budget, and a link.",
      "suggestion": "Create a main dot for the Insurance goal and use separate dashes for the target number, scope, and budget details."
    },
    {
      "type": "TF4-NumberFormat",
      "location": "- For GPY, **10747** Go-aheads have been issued with subsidy released for **2606** completed projects",
      "issue": "Numbers greater than 999 are missing commas, which hurts readability.",
      "suggestion": "Format the numbers with commas for clarity: '10,747' and '2,606'."
    },
    {
      "type": "TF2-Spacing",
      "location": "- **Go-Palan Yojana (GPY):** As on Sept 2, **65K** applications against a saturation target of **73K**...",
      "issue": "Missing space between number and unit ('65K', '73K').",
      "suggestion": "Add a space for consistency and readability: '65 K', '73 K'."
    },
    {
      "type": "TF2-Spacing",
      "location": "- As per saturation analysis **6 L** Kharif Minikits and **2 L** Rabi Minikits should be distributed annually",
      "issue": "Inconsistent spacing. Here 'L' has a space, but elsewhere '2.2L' does not.",
      "suggestion": "Standardize the format. Suggest using '6 L' and changing '2.2L' to '2.2 L' for consistency."
    },
    {
      "type": "TF5-SymbolConsistency",
      "location": "Document uses 'Cr.', 'Cr', 'Lakh', 'L', 'K', '₹', 'Rs.'",
      "issue": "Multiple inconsistent formats are used for currency and large numbers.",
      "suggestion": "Choose a single, consistent format for currency (e.g., '₹ X Cr', '₹ Y L') and use it throughout the document."
    },
    {
      "type": "TF6-Acronyms",
      "location": "Acronyms like MKY, GPY, MCM, OLRDS, NABARD are used throughout.",
      "issue": "Many domain-specific acronyms are used without being defined on their first appearance.",
      "suggestion": "On first use, write out the full term followed by the acronym in parentheses. E.g., 'Mukhyamantri Kamdhenu Yojana (MKY)'."
    },
    {
      "type": "TF3-Capitalization",
      "location": "- **farmer awareness**, IEC has been done through SMS blast...",
      "issue": "Bolded sub-header is in sentence case ('farmer awareness'), while others like '**Go-Palan Yojana (GPY):**' are in title case.",
      "suggestion": "Apply a consistent capitalization rule (e.g., Title Case) to all bolded headers for a professional look."
    },
    {
      "type": "TF3-Capitalization",
      "location": "- Additional 76 Cr. has been requested from finance dept. to meet the FY 25-26 target...",
      "issue": "Inconsistent capitalization of 'department'. 'Dept.' is capitalized in other lines, but 'dept.' is lowercase here.",
      "suggestion": "Use a consistent capitalization for recurring terms like 'Department'/'Dept.'."
    },
    {
      "type": "TF8-Indentation",
      "location": "The entire document follows a flat structure of '*' headers and '-' dashes.",
      "issue": "Lack of indentation makes it impossible to see the hierarchy of information. Points that should be sub-details appear at the same level as main initiatives.",
      "suggestion": "Restructure content to use indented sub-dashes for supporting details. For example, details about the CTF pilot plan should be indented under the main CTF dash."
    },
    {
      "type": "TF10-PatternBreaking",
      "location": "The document uses bolded text within a dash to introduce a new sub-initiative, e.g., '- **Cattle Trade Fair (CTF):** ...'",
      "issue": "This breaks the standard dot-dash structure. A new initiative should be a new main dot, not a formatted dash.",
      "suggestion": "Restructure each initiative to start with a main dot (•) to clearly separate it from others."
    },
    {
      "type": "TF7-MissingLinks",
      "location": "The entire document uses embedded markdown links like '[text](url)' instead of the '(>>)' pattern.",
      "issue": "This formatting choice makes lines longer and visually cluttered, contributing to the line length problem.",
      "suggestion": "Adopt the '(>>)' pattern for all evidence links to improve scannability and conciseness. E.g., '...26% completed (>>)'."
    },
    {
      "type": "TF9-BoldFormatting",
      "location": "Bold formatting is used for initiative names, metrics (e.g., **65K**), and key terms.",
      "issue": "The application of bolding is inconsistent. Sometimes numbers are bold, sometimes not. This reduces the impact of formatting.",
      "suggestion": "Establish a clear rule for bolding. For example, 'Bold all key metrics (X/Y) and initiative titles only' and apply it consistently."
    },
    {
      "type": "TF1-LineLength",
      "location": "- [IVRS advisory](https://...) has been developed and disseminated with farmers to motivate and support sowing activities.",
      "issue": "Line is 205 characters long. The link text is very long and the description is verbose.",
      "suggestion": "Shorten to: '- IVRS advisory developed & disseminated to support sowing activities (>>)'."
    },
    {
      "type": "TF4-NumberFormat",
      "location": "- Out of 1850 claims received, documents submitted for 1317 claims...",
      "issue": "Numbers over 999 ('1850', '1317') lack commas.",
      "suggestion": "Add commas for readability: '1,850' and '1,317'."
    }
  ],
  "initiativesAnalysis": [
    {
      "dotText": "* ToC Bucket: Targeted inputs aimed at increasing milk production through inorganic means (Animal Induction) \n Mapped MCM: Dept. working in scheme saturation mode for Mukhyamantri Kamdhenu Yojana (MKY)",
      "critique": {
        "goalFraming": "This isn't a progress dot; it's a section header. It sets a high-level context but doesn't state a specific, measurable goal for the initiatives that follow. The manager has to read through all the dashes to understand the actual targets.",
        "progressQuantification": "N/A - This is a header and contains no progress metrics.",
        "evidenceLink": "N/A - This is a header.",
        "formatting": "This structure violates the core principle of using dots for main points. It acts as a category title, which is useful but should be formatted differently (e.g., as a simple bolded title).",
        "suggestions": "Suggest removing the '*' and making this a bolded, standalone title. Then, each initiative within this bucket (GPY, CTF) should become its own main dot (•)."
      },
      "dashesAnalysis": [
        {
          "dashText": "- **Go-Palan Yojana (GPY):** As on Sept 2, **65K** applications against a saturation target of **73K** have been received",
          "critique": {
            "supportForDot": "This dash acts as a main point rather than supporting a parent dot. It introduces a new initiative.",
            "dataCompleteness": "The data is good but could be presented more clearly as a percentage. It states the 'what' (applications received) but lacks a link to evidence.",
            "quantification": "Quantification is strong (65K vs 73K).",
            "formatting": "The line is 123 characters, which is too long. It also has spacing issues ('65K', '73K').",
            "tacticalIssues": "TF1-LineLength, TF2-Spacing.",
            "suggestions": "Rewrite as a main dot: '• GPY: Received 65 K / 73 K (89%) applications towards saturation target (>>)'"
          }
        },
        {
          "dashText": "- For GPY, **10747** Go-aheads have been issued with subsidy released for **2606** completed projects",
          "critique": {
            "supportForDot": "This logically supports the GPY initiative.",
            "dataCompleteness": "The progress numbers are provided, but the targets for 'Go-aheads' and 'completed projects' are missing, so the manager cannot assess performance.",
            "quantification": "Quantified, but lacks context (targets).",
            "formatting": "Line is 104 characters long and number formatting is missing.",
            "tacticalIssues": "TF1-LineLength, TF4-NumberFormat.",
            "suggestions": "Rewrite as a supporting dash with targets: '- Issued 10,747 Go-Aheads (Target: 15K); released subsidy for 2,606 projects (Target: 5K)'"
          }
        }
      ],
      "nextStepsAssessment": "Next steps are present but mixed in with progress updates. For instance, 'Additional 76 Cr. has been requested...' is a next step. It would be clearer to group all forward-looking actions under a 'Next Steps' sub-header for each initiative."
    }
  ],
  "strengthsToPreserve": [
    "Strong quantification: The document is filled with specific numbers and metrics, which is excellent for data-driven reviews.",
    "Inclusion of evidence: Most major points are backed by links to detailed documents, spreadsheets, or dashboards, allowing for deep dives.",
    "Logical grouping: The use of 'ToC Buckets' to organize initiatives into strategic areas (e.g., Animal Nutrition, Breed Improvement) provides a clear high-level structure."
  ],
  "topPriorityImprovements": [
    "Restructure the entire document to follow the Dot-Dash hierarchy. Each initiative (GPY, On-Call AI, Insurance, etc.) should be a main dot (•) stating the goal, with indented dashes (-) showing quantified progress and next steps.",
    "Aggressively enforce the single-line rule. Break down every line over 100 characters into a parent idea and supporting, indented sub-dashes. This will dramatically improve scannability and clarity.",
    "Perform a thorough tactical cleanup. Systematically fix all formatting issues, including adding commas to numbers, ensuring consistent spacing and capitalization, and standardizing acronyms and currency symbols for a more professional and readable report."
  ]
 }
	{
	"documentTitle": "LEAP - Pragati",
	"overallAssessment": {
	"mahaVakya_UserCentricity": "The document is rich with data but struggles with user-centricity. A +1 manager cannot quickly understand progress because the core structure is a list of updates rather than a clear 'Goal vs. Actual' format for each initiative. The extremely long lines (over 80 lines exceed 100 characters) make it very difficult to scan. For instance, the line on 'Cattle Trade Fair (CTF)' is 270 characters long, containing a link, a proposal, and a connection to another fair, which is too much information for one line. While evidence is linked, the lack of a clear, scannable structure is the biggest barrier to quick comprehension.",
	"panchSutra1_ClearObjective": "The strategic objectives are stated at a high level in the 'ToC Bucket' and 'Mapped MCM' lines. However, the specific, measurable goal for each individual initiative is often buried within the progress update or absent altogether. For example, in '- Go-Palan Yojana (GPY): As on Sept 2, 65K applications against a saturation target of 73K...', the target is mentioned but not framed as a goal upfront, making it harder to evaluate performance at a glance.",
	"panchSutra2_OverallFlow": "The overall flow is weak because it doesn't use the 'dot' structure to tell a story. The main bullets are section headers ('ToC Bucket'), not progress points. Reading these headers alone provides no information about what was achieved. The real initiatives are introduced with bolded text within dashes (e.g., '- Insurance:...'), creating a flat, list-like structure that is hard to follow. A manager has to read every line to piece together the progress story.",
	"panchSutra3_DashSupport": "The parent-child relationship between dots and dashes is not followed. The document uses section headers, and then all subsequent lines are dashes. Many dashes introduce entirely new topics instead of supporting a single parent idea. For example, under the first 'ToC Bucket', the document updates on 'Go-Palan Yojana' and then introduces a new initiative, 'Cattle Trade Fair (CTF)', as another dash. This should be a separate main dot, not a dash within the same stream of thought.",
	"panchSutra4_Quantification": "Quantification is a significant strength of this document; nearly every point is backed by numbers. However, the presentation could be more effective. Targets are sometimes missing, and the 'X/Y' format is not used consistently. For example, '- For GPY, 10747 Go-aheads have been issued with subsidy released for 2606 completed projects' gives two numbers but doesn't state the targets for each, making it hard to assess if this is good or bad progress. Also, number formatting (commas) is consistently missed for numbers >999.",
	"panchSutra5_OnePageLimit": "The document severely violates the principle of brevity and scannability due to excessive line lengths. With 88 lines flagged as being too long, it's highly unlikely this fits on a single, readable page. The content needs to be aggressively edited and broken down into hierarchical points to improve conciseness and adhere to the single-line constraint.",
	"evidenceLinks": "The author has done a good job of including links to supporting evidence for many claims. This is a major strength. However, the format uses embedded markdown hyperlinks like '[text](url)' instead of the standard, less intrusive '(>>)' pattern. This makes the lines longer and more cluttered. For example, the line on 'Unified Payment Layer' is 209 characters long, with the link text itself contributing to the length."
	},
	"tacticalFormattingIssues": [
	{
	"type": "TF1-LineLength",
	"location": "- Cattle Trade Fair (CTF): [CTF](https://...) is being proposed as a forum to connect farmers with private traders...",
	"issue": "Line is 270 characters long, which is more than double the recommended maximum length. It contains multiple ideas.",
	"suggestion": "Break this into a main dot for the initiative and supporting dashes for the proposal, target audience, and pilot plan."
	},
	{
	"type": "TF1-LineLength",
	"location": "- Insurance: For FY 25-26, target of [4.5 Lakh cattle](https://...) covering MKY and non-MKY animals, set with the budget of ₹ 53.7 Cr.",
	"issue": "Line is 253 characters long. It contains the target, scope, budget, and a link.",
	"suggestion": "Create a main dot for the Insurance goal and use separate dashes for the target number, scope, and budget details."
	},
	{
	"type": "TF4-NumberFormat",
	"location": "- For GPY, 10747 Go-aheads have been issued with subsidy released for 2606 completed projects",
	"issue": "Numbers greater than 999 are missing commas, which hurts readability.",
	"suggestion": "Format the numbers with commas for clarity: '10,747' and '2,606'."
	},
	{
	"type": "TF2-Spacing",
	"location": "- Go-Palan Yojana (GPY): As on Sept 2, 65K applications against a saturation target of 73K...",
	"issue": "Missing space between number and unit ('65K', '73K').",
	"suggestion": "Add a space for consistency and readability: '65 K', '73 K'."
	},
	{
	"type": "TF2-Spacing",
	"location": "- As per saturation analysis 6 L Kharif Minikits and 2 L Rabi Minikits should be distributed annually",
	"issue": "Inconsistent spacing. Here 'L' has a space, but elsewhere '2.2L' does not.",
	"suggestion": "Standardize the format. Suggest using '6 L' and changing '2.2L' to '2.2 L' for consistency."
	},
	{
	"type": "TF5-SymbolConsistency",
	"location": "Document uses 'Cr.', 'Cr', 'Lakh', 'L', 'K', '₹', 'Rs.'",
	"issue": "Multiple inconsistent formats are used for currency and large numbers.",
	"suggestion": "Choose a single, consistent format for currency (e.g., '₹ X Cr', '₹ Y L') and use it throughout the document."
	},
	{
	"type": "TF6-Acronyms",
	"location": "Acronyms like MKY, GPY, MCM, OLRDS, NABARD are used throughout.",
	"issue": "Many domain-specific acronyms are used without being defined on their first appearance.",
	"suggestion": "On first use, write out the full term followed by the acronym in parentheses. E.g., 'Mukhyamantri Kamdhenu Yojana (MKY)'."
	},
	{
	"type": "TF3-Capitalization",
	"location": "- farmer awareness, IEC has been done through SMS blast...",
	"issue": "Bolded sub-header is in sentence case ('farmer awareness'), while others like 'Go-Palan Yojana (GPY):' are in title case.",
	"suggestion": "Apply a consistent capitalization rule (e.g., Title Case) to all bolded headers for a professional look."
	},
	{
	"type": "TF3-Capitalization",
	"location": "- Additional 76 Cr. has been requested from finance dept. to meet the FY 25-26 target...",
	"issue": "Inconsistent capitalization of 'department'. 'Dept.' is capitalized in other lines, but 'dept.' is lowercase here.",
	"suggestion": "Use a consistent capitalization for recurring terms like 'Department'/'Dept.'."
	},
	{
	"type": "TF8-Indentation",
	"location": "The entire document follows a flat structure of '*' headers and '-' dashes.",
	"issue": "Lack of indentation makes it impossible to see the hierarchy of information. Points that should be sub-details appear at the same level as main initiatives.",
	"suggestion": "Restructure content to use indented sub-dashes for supporting details. For example, details about the CTF pilot plan should be indented under the main CTF dash."
	},
	{
	"type": "TF10-PatternBreaking",
	"location": "The document uses bolded text within a dash to introduce a new sub-initiative, e.g., '- Cattle Trade Fair (CTF): ...'",
	"issue": "This breaks the standard dot-dash structure. A new initiative should be a new main dot, not a formatted dash.",
	"suggestion": "Restructure each initiative to start with a main dot (•) to clearly separate it from others."
	},
	{
	"type": "TF7-MissingLinks",
	"location": "The entire document uses embedded markdown links like '[text](url)' instead of the '(>>)' pattern.",
	"issue": "This formatting choice makes lines longer and visually cluttered, contributing to the line length problem.",
	"suggestion": "Adopt the '(>>)' pattern for all evidence links to improve scannability and conciseness. E.g., '...26% completed (>>)'."
	},
	{
	"type": "TF9-BoldFormatting",
	"location": "Bold formatting is used for initiative names, metrics (e.g., 65K), and key terms.",
	"issue": "The application of bolding is inconsistent. Sometimes numbers are bold, sometimes not. This reduces the impact of formatting.",
	"suggestion": "Establish a clear rule for bolding. For example, 'Bold all key metrics (X/Y) and initiative titles only' and apply it consistently."
	},
	{
	"type": "TF1-LineLength",
	"location": "- [IVRS advisory](https://...) has been developed and disseminated with farmers to motivate and support sowing activities.",
	"issue": "Line is 205 characters long. The link text is very long and the description is verbose.",
	"suggestion": "Shorten to: '- IVRS advisory developed & disseminated to support sowing activities (>>)'."
	},
	{
	"type": "TF4-NumberFormat",
	"location": "- Out of 1850 claims received, documents submitted for 1317 claims...",
	"issue": "Numbers over 999 ('1850', '1317') lack commas.",
	"suggestion": "Add commas for readability: '1,850' and '1,317'."
	}
	],
	"initiativesAnalysis": [
	{
	"dotText": "* ToC Bucket: Targeted inputs aimed at increasing milk production through inorganic means (Animal Induction) \n Mapped MCM: Dept. working in scheme saturation mode for Mukhyamantri Kamdhenu Yojana (MKY)",
	"critique": {
	"goalFraming": "This isn't a progress dot; it's a section header. It sets a high-level context but doesn't state a specific, measurable goal for the initiatives that follow. The manager has to read through all the dashes to understand the actual targets.",
	"progressQuantification": "N/A - This is a header and contains no progress metrics.",
	"evidenceLink": "N/A - This is a header.",
	"formatting": "This structure violates the core principle of using dots for main points. It acts as a category title, which is useful but should be formatted differently (e.g., as a simple bolded title).",
	"suggestions": "Suggest removing the '*' and making this a bolded, standalone title. Then, each initiative within this bucket (GPY, CTF) should become its own main dot (•)."
	},
	"dashesAnalysis": [
	{
	"dashText": "- Go-Palan Yojana (GPY): As on Sept 2, 65K applications against a saturation target of 73K have been received",
	"critique": {
	"supportForDot": "This dash acts as a main point rather than supporting a parent dot. It introduces a new initiative.",
	"dataCompleteness": "The data is good but could be presented more clearly as a percentage. It states the 'what' (applications received) but lacks a link to evidence.",
	"quantification": "Quantification is strong (65K vs 73K).",
	"formatting": "The line is 123 characters, which is too long. It also has spacing issues ('65K', '73K').",
	"tacticalIssues": "TF1-LineLength, TF2-Spacing.",
	"suggestions": "Rewrite as a main dot: '• GPY: Received 65 K / 73 K (89%) applications towards saturation target (>>)'"
	}
	},
	{
	"dashText": "- For GPY, 10747 Go-aheads have been issued with subsidy released for 2606 completed projects",
	"critique": {
	"supportForDot": "This logically supports the GPY initiative.",
	"dataCompleteness": "The progress numbers are provided, but the targets for 'Go-aheads' and 'completed projects' are missing, so the manager cannot assess performance.",
	"quantification": "Quantified, but lacks context (targets).",
	"formatting": "Line is 104 characters long and number formatting is missing.",
	"tacticalIssues": "TF1-LineLength, TF4-NumberFormat.",
	"suggestions": "Rewrite as a supporting dash with targets: '- Issued 10,747 Go-Aheads (Target: 15K); released subsidy for 2,606 projects (Target: 5K)'"
	}
	}
	],
	"nextStepsAssessment": "Next steps are present but mixed in with progress updates. For instance, 'Additional 76 Cr. has been requested...' is a next step. It would be clearer to group all forward-looking actions under a 'Next Steps' sub-header for each initiative."
	}
	],
	"strengthsToPreserve": [
	"Strong quantification: The document is filled with specific numbers and metrics, which is excellent for data-driven reviews.",
	"Inclusion of evidence: Most major points are backed by links to detailed documents, spreadsheets, or dashboards, allowing for deep dives.",
	"Logical grouping: The use of 'ToC Buckets' to organize initiatives into strategic areas (e.g., Animal Nutrition, Breed Improvement) provides a clear high-level structure."
	],
	"topPriorityImprovements": [
	"Restructure the entire document to follow the Dot-Dash hierarchy. Each initiative (GPY, On-Call AI, Insurance, etc.) should be a main dot (•) stating the goal, with indented dashes (-) showing quantified progress and next steps.",
	"Aggressively enforce the single-line rule. Break down every line over 100 characters into a parent idea and supporting, indented sub-dashes. This will dramatically improve scannability and clarity.",
	"Perform a thorough tactical cleanup. Systematically fix all formatting issues, including adding commas to numbers, ensuring consistent spacing and capitalization, and standardizing acronyms and currency symbols for a more professional and readable report."
	]
	}
No results found