Interpreting calibration curves to determine which model is performing well can be done by assessing how close the curves are to the ideal calibration line (the diagonal line from bottom-left to top-right, y=x).
Here are some key observations you can make from calibration curves:
-
Near the Diagonal Line (Ideal Calibration): If a model's calibration curve for a particular class closely follows the diagonal line (y=x), it indicates that the predicted probabilities are well-calibrated. In other words, when the curve is close to the diagonal, the model's predicted probabilities are reliable and reflect the true class distribution.
-
Above the Diagonal Line: When the calibration curve is above the diagonal line, it suggests that the model is overconfident. This means that when the model predicts a high probability for a class, it's more likely to be correct, but it may also indicate that the model is less cautious in making predictions.
-
Below the Diagonal Line: Conversely, when the calibration curve is below the diagonal line, it indicates that the model is underconfident. In this case, when the model predicts a high probability for a class, it's less likely to be correct. The model might be too conservative in making predictions.
-
Curve Shape: The shape of the curve is also informative. A well-calibrated model will have a curve that smoothly approaches the diagonal. If the curve exhibits large deviations from the diagonal, it might indicate issues with the model's calibration.
In summary, you should look for calibration curves that are as close to the diagonal (ideal calibration) as possible. Models with curves closer to the diagonal are generally better calibrated and have more reliable probability estimates. However, calibration curves alone may not tell the full story about a model's performance;