Scenario: Mission-critical release.
Time left: 2 days.
Code changes: Still coming.
QA? Under pressure β but not panicking.
Because this is when we lead.
In a recent release for a digital health platform, we had features like:
- π§Ύ Prescription updates
- π Data synchronization
- π₯ User onboarding
But delays in dev meant QA had only 48 hours. Here's what I did:
- Prioritized core workflows: login, health data, prescriptions
- Deferred: UI typos, low-severity bugs
π― Focused on what breaks the business, not minor flaws
- Asked devs which modules were stable
- Flagged unstable ones to avoid wasting test cycles
- Involved PMs to confirm βmust-haveβ features
π― QA became a bridge, not a blocker
- Broke down regression into manageable chunks
- Delegated low-risk areas to junior QAs
- Ran sanity checks early on partial builds
π― Moved fast without missing blind spots
- Sent status updates every 6 hours
- Used clear indicators: β
Passed |
β οΈ In Progress | β Blocked - No surprises for stakeholders
π― Kept the team aligned, even under stress
- Ran automated regression tests overnight
- Focused manual testing on new/critical paths
π― Saved time, gained depth
- Released on time
- Zero post-release critical issues
- Earned trust across Dev, Product, and Ops
β
In tight deadlines, QA is not just the tester β
Weβre the strategist, the negotiator, and the calm within chaos.
π Donβt just test β enable the release.
Software Engineer (QA) | HealthTech | Passionate about testing, tools, and UI quality.
Follow for more QA insights π
#QA #TestStrategy #SoftwareTesting #AgileQA #ProductQuality #RealLifeQA #ReleaseReadiness