Khatiketki · February 5, 2026 02:09
diff --git a/03-build-your-first-agent b/03-build-your-first-agent
 Part 1: Agent Fundamentals
 Task 1.1: Core Concepts 📚
 1.	What is a "node" in Aden's architecture? How does it differ from a traditional function?
 •	The "Node": In Aden, a node is an atomic unit of intelligence. Unlike a traditional function (which is static and deterministic), a node is an LLM-powered entity that possesses intent, can handle unstructured data, and makes decisions about which tools to use.
 2.	Explain the SDK-wrapped node concept. What four capabilities does every node get automatically?
 SDK-Wrapped Node Capabilities: Every node automatically receives:
 1.	Observability: Built-in logging and metric tracing.
 2.	Memory Access: Hooks for STM and LTM.
 3.	Governance: Budget and policy enforcement.
 4.	Self-Healing: Automatic error reporting to the Coding Agent.
 3. What's the difference between:
 o	A Coding Agent and a Worker Agent
 o	Goal-driven vs workflow-driven development
 o	Predefined edges vs dynamic connections
 In the Aden Hive ecosystem, the distinction between these concepts represents the shift from manual automation to autonomous AI orchestration.
 Coding Agent vs. Worker Agent
 Think of the Coding Agent as the "Architect" and the Worker Agent as the "Contractor."
 •	Coding Agent: This is a high-level agent responsible for Build-time logic. It takes your natural language goal, reasons about what nodes and tools are needed, and actually writes the connection code to assemble a system. It doesn't perform the task; it builds the machine that does.
 •	Worker Agent: These are the specialized agents created by the Coding Agent to operate at Runtime. They have specific roles (e.g., a "Research Worker" or a "Writer Worker") and execute the actual steps of the goal using the tools they've been granted.
 ________________________________________
 Goal-Driven vs. Workflow-Driven Development
 This is the core paradigm shift of the Aden framework.
 •	Workflow-Driven: Traditional development where you manually define every step. You tell the system: "Step A: Scrape this URL. Step B: Summarize it. Step C: Email it." If Step A changes, the whole workflow often breaks because the logic is hardcoded.
 •	Goal-Driven: You define the outcome, not the steps. You tell the system: "Keep me updated on competitor news via Slack." The system autonomously determines which steps are necessary to reach that goal and can adapt its path if it encounters an obstacle.
 ________________________________________
 Predefined Edges vs. Dynamic Connections
 This describes how data moves between different parts of the AI system.
 •	Predefined Edges: Found in traditional graph-based tools (like LangGraph or Flowise). You draw a line from Node A to Node B. The data must follow that line every single time.
 •	Dynamic Connections: Aden uses "connection code" generated on the fly. Instead of a static line, the system uses an LLM to decide at runtime: "Based on the output of Node A, I should now send this to Node C instead of Node B."


      4. Why does Aden generate "connection code" instead of using a fixed graph structure?
 Connection Code vs. Fixed Graph: Aden generates code to connect nodes dynamically because real-world workflows are non-linear. This allows the system to bypass nodes or add "validation loops" on the fly without manual refactoring of a static JSON configuration.
 Task 1.2: Memory Systems 🧠
 1.	Describe the three types of memory available to agents:
 o	Shared Memory
 o	STM (Short-Term Memory)
 o	LTM (Long-Term Memory / RLM)

 https://imgur.com/a/nLBc0H9
 ________________________________________
 2.	When would an agent use each type?
 Effective memory management is what allows Aden Hive agents to handle complex, long-running tasks without losing context or repeating mistakes.
 When to Use Each Memory Type

 https://imgur.com/a/gYdfqj8
 ________________________________________
 3.	How "Session Local Memory Isolation" Works
 In a multi-tenant or multi-team environment, you cannot have Agent A's conversation data leaking into Agent B's workspace. Session Local Memory Isolation is the security layer that prevents this.
 1.	Unique Session IDs: Every time an agent execution begins, the system generates a unique session_id.
 2.	Namespace Scoping: All reads and writes to the STM are scoped strictly to that session_id.
 3.	Ephemeral Lifecycle: Unlike LTM, Session Local memory is typically flushed or moved to cold storage once the goal is reached or the session expires.
 4.	Sandbox Environment: For the LLM, this acts as a "clean slate." The agent only "sees" the context relevant to the current user's request, preventing it from hallucinating information from other users' history.
 This isolation is critical for Compliance and Security, ensuring that even if two agents share the same "Coding Agent" logic, their operational data remains completely private and distinct.
 Task 1.3: Human-in-the-Loop 🙋
 Explain the HITL system:
 The Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) system in Aden Hive is a safety and governance layer designed to ensure that autonomous agents remain aligned with human intent, especially in high-stakes environments.
 1. What Triggers a Human Intervention Point?
 Human intervention is not just a "pause" button; it is a programmatic requirement defined during the Build Phase. A trigger occurs in two main ways:
 •	Explicit Intervention Nodes: The Coding Agent inserts specific "Intervention Nodes" into the graph for sensitive actions (e.g., spending money, sending a public email, or deleting data).
 •	Threshold-Based Triggers: Governance policies can trigger a pause if an agent's confidence score drops below a certain percentage or if a tool call exceeds a pre-defined "Risk Score."
 ________________________________________
 2. What Happens if a Human Doesn't Respond Within the Timeout?
 Aden Hive uses a Tiered Escalation Policy to prevent system deadlocks. When a timeout is reached, the framework typically follows one of three paths based on the node's configuration:
 •	Safe Failure: The session is terminated, and the failure is recorded. The system does not proceed with the high-risk action.
 •	Default Fallback: The agent executes a "safe" version of the task (e.g., saving a draft instead of sending an email).
 •	Escalation: The intervention request is escalated to a higher-level "Admin" or "Supervisor" team via Slack, Email, or the Honeycomb Dashboard.
 ________________________________________
 3. Three Essential HITL Scenarios
 In a production multi-agent system, HITL is the bridge between autonomy and accountability.

 https://imgur.com/a/gYdfqj8

 Part 2: Agent Design (Content Marketing)
 To complete Part 2 of the Build Your First Agent Challenge, here is a robust design for a Content Marketing Agent System. This architecture leverages Aden's unique ability to handle dynamic connections and self-improvement loops.
 ________________________________________
 Task 2.1: Design a Multi-Agent System 🎭
 Agent Diagram
 The system operates in a linear flow with a critical feedback loop for self-improvement.
 Agent Descriptions

 https://imgur.com/a/WzK7o8Y

 Failure Scenarios & Graceful Handling
 •	News Scout: If a source is down, it retries with an exponential backoff. If it finds no news, it enters a "Sleep" state instead of triggering downstream agents.
 •	Copy Architect: If the LLM generates a draft that fails a "Brand Alignment" check (internal node logic), it self-corrects using a "grounding" prompt before proceeding.
 Human Checkpoints
 1.	Editorial Review: Occurs between the Copy Architect and Distribution Manager. The system pauses, sends the draft to a Slack/Honeycomb channel, and waits for a "Publish" or "Reject with Feedback" signal.
 Self-Improvement
 When a human rejects a draft, the Failure Data (original draft + human feedback) is captured in LTM. Before the next run, the Copy Architect retrieves this feedback. If rejections for a specific reason (e.g., "too technical") hit a threshold, the Coding Agent is triggered to update the Copy Architect's system prompt.
 ________________________________________
 Task 2.2: Goal Definition 🎯
 The User Goal:
 "Build an autonomous content pipeline that monitors our 'Product Updates' RSS feed. For every new item, generate a 600-word blog post in a 'friendly but professional' tone. Cross-reference the post with our internal feature documentation to ensure 100% technical accuracy. Success Criteria: All posts must be approved by the marketing team via Slack before going live on WordPress. Failure Handling: If the WordPress API is unreachable, notify the DevOps channel and retry every hour. If a human rejects a post, analyze the feedback to adjust the writing style for future drafts."
 ________________________________________
 Task 2.3: Test Cases 📋

 https://imgur.com/a/T4J5dmz
 ________________________________________
 Part 3: Practical Implementation
 Task 3.1: Agent Pseudocode 💻
 This pseudocode follows the Aden Hive SDK pattern where agents are "wrapped" with automatic capabilities like memory access and telemetry.
 Python
 class CopyArchitectAgent:
    """
    Agent that takes raw facts and writes branded, technically accurate blog posts.
    """

    def __init__(self, config):
        self.llm = config.llm_provider  # e.g., OpenAI or Anthropic
        self.memory = config.memory_client
        self.tools = config.tool_registry
        self.telemetry = config.telemetry_logger

    async def execute(self, input_data):
        # 1. READ: Pull Brand Voice from Shared Memory
        brand_voice = await self.memory.get_shared("brand_guidelines")
        
        # 2. READ: Pull past rejection lessons from LTM (Long-Term Memory)
        past_lessons = await self.memory.get_ltm(
            query="blog post style feedback", 
            limit=3
        )

        # 3. TOOL USE: Search internal knowledge base for technical grounding
        technical_context = await self.tools.call(
            "search_company_knowledge", 
            query=input_data['news_summary']
        )

        # 4. LLM CALL: Synthesize content
        try:
            prompt = self.generate_task_prompt(
                input_data['news_summary'], 
                brand_voice, 
                technical_context,
                past_lessons
            )
            draft = await self.llm.generate(prompt)
            
            # Write draft to Short-Term Memory for the next node (Editor)
            await self.memory.set_stm("current_draft", draft)
            return {"status": "success", "draft": draft}

        except Exception as e:
            return await self.handle_failure(e, input_data)

    async def handle_failure(self, error, context):
        # Categorize failure (e.g., LLM Hallucination vs. Tool Timeout)
        self.telemetry.log_event("agent_failure", error=str(error), data=context)
        
        # Self-healing attempt: Retry with a "Grounding" constraint and lower temperature
        return await self.llm.generate(
            "Rewrite the previous prompt but stay strictly within the provided context.",
            temperature=0.1
        )

    async def learn_from_feedback(self, feedback):
        # Process human rejection
        analysis_prompt = f"Analyze this rejection feedback: {feedback}. What rule should we follow next time?"
        rule = await self.llm.generate(analysis_prompt)
        
        # Save distilled rule to LTM for future executions
        await self.memory.save_ltm(rule, metadata={"source": "human_feedback"})
 ________________________________________
 Task 3.2: Prompt Engineering 📝
 SYSTEM PROMPT
 Plaintext
 You are a Lead Copy Architect for Aden Hive. Your mission is to convert technical news into engaging, accurate blog posts.
 - TONE: Professional but accessible. Avoid corporate jargon.
 - ACCURACY: Never state a feature unless it is explicitly mentioned in the provided TECHNICAL CONTEXT.
 - STYLE: Use Markdown. Include H1, H2s, and a bulleted "Key Takeaways" section.
 TASK PROMPT TEMPLATE
 Plaintext
 Given the following:
 NEWS SUMMARY: {news_content}
 TECHNICAL CONTEXT: {context}
 BRAND GUIDELINES: {brand_voice}
 PAST LESSONS: {past_lessons}

 Write a blog post that explains the value of this update to a developer audience. 
 Ensure you address any issues mentioned in the PAST LESSONS to avoid previous mistakes.
 FEEDBACK LEARNING PROMPT
 Plaintext
 Your previous output was rejected with the following feedback: "{feedback}"
 Identify the core failure (e.g., Tone mismatch, Hallucination, Formatting).
 Provide a single-sentence instruction for yourself that will prevent this error in the future.
 ________________________________________
 Task 3.3: Tool Definitions 🔧
 Python
 tools = [
    {
        "name": "search_company_knowledge",
        "description": "Searches the internal technical documentation for feature details.",
        "parameters": {
            "query": "string - the technical term or feature to search for",
            "limit": "integer - number of documents to return"
        },
        "returns": "A list of relevant documentation snippets."
    },
    {
        "name": "wordpress_publisher",
        "description": "Uploads a markdown draft to WordPress as a 'Pending Review' post.",
        "parameters": {
            "title": "string - post title",
            "content": "string - markdown content",
            "category": "string - e.g., 'Product Updates'"
        },
        "returns": "The draft post ID and live preview URL."
    },
    {
        "name": "slack_notifier",
        "description": "Sends the blog draft link to the #marketing-approval channel for human review.",
        "parameters": {
            "channel": "string - the target channel name",
            "message": "string - notification text and link"
        },
        "returns": "Success status of the notification."
    }
 ]
 ________________________________________
 Part 4: Advanced Challenges
 Task 4.1: Failure Evolution Design 🔄
 Design the self-improvement mechanism in detail:
 1.	Failure Classification: Create a taxonomy of failures for your agent
 - LLM Failures: rate limit, content filter, hallucination
 - Tool Failures: API down, invalid response, timeout
 - Logic Failures: wrong output format, missing data
 - Human Rejection: quality issues, off-brand, factual error
 2.	Learning Storage: What data do you store for each failure type?
 3.	Evolution Strategy: How does the Coding Agent use failure data to improve?
 4.	Guardrails: What prevents the system from making things worse?

 1. Failure Taxonomy & Learning Storage
 To improve, the system must first understand the nature of the failure. For every error, the framework captures a Contextual Snapshot stored in TimescaleDB.

 https://imgur.com/a/dP29zEM

 ________________________________________
 2. Evolution Strategy: The Coding Agent's Role
 The Coding Agent acts as a background "Optimizer" that doesn't just retry a failed task, but rewrites the agent's DNA.
 1.	Trigger: An agent hits a threshold of "Terminal Failures" or receives a specific "Request for Improvement" from the dashboard.
 2.	RCA (Root Cause Analysis): The Coding Agent analyzes the stored snapshots. It determines if the fix is Structural (needs a new node), Procedural (needs better tool parameters), or Cognitive (needs a revised system prompt).
 3.	Mutation: The Coding Agent generates a new GraphSpec (agent.json) or updates the Connection Code.
 4.	Shadow Testing: Before deployment, the Coding Agent runs the new version against the failed input in a "Shadow Mode." If the output matches the goal or passes the validation check, it moves to deployment.
 ________________________________________
 3. Guardrails: Preventing "Regressive Evolution"
 Self-improving systems can become unstable if they "over-fit" to a single failure. Aden implements three primary guardrails:
 •	Version Pinning & Rollback: Every evolution creates a new immutable version. If performance metrics (Success Rate/Latency) drop in the new version, the Control Plane automatically rolls back to the last "Golden Version."
 •	Semantic Consistency Check: The Coding Agent uses a high-reasoning model (e.g., GPT-4o) to verify that the "evolved" prompt doesn't contradict the original User Goal.
 •	Human-in-the-Loop Approval: For high-stakes environments (Finance/DevOps), evolution is "Provisional." A human must review the proposed prompt change or graph modification in the Honeycomb Dashboard before it is applied to production.
 ________________________________________
 Task 4.2: Cost Optimization 💰
 Your agent system will be called frequently. Design cost optimizations:
 1.	Model Selection: When to use GPT-4 vs GPT-3.5 vs Claude Haiku?
 2.	Caching Strategy: What can be cached to reduce LLM calls?
 3.	Batching: How can you batch operations for efficiency?
 4.	Budget Rules: Design budget rules for your system
 ________________________________________
 1. Model Selection: The Tiered Intelligence Strategy
 Not every task requires the reasoning power (or cost) of a flagship model. We use a "Right-Sized" model routing strategy:
 •	Claude 3.5 Haiku / GPT-4o-mini (Efficiency Tier):
 o	When: Used for deterministic or structural tasks like summarization, JSON formatting, routing decisions, and initial data extraction.
 o	Agent: The News Scout uses this to distill RSS feeds into raw facts.
 •	GPT-4o / Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Performance Tier):
 o	When: Used for creative synthesis, complex tool use, and multi-step reasoning.
 o	Agent: The Copy Architect uses this to ensure brand voice and technical accuracy.
 •	GPT-4o (High-Reasoning Tier):
 o	When: Reserved for the Coding Agent during the evolution/self-healing phase to diagnose complex failures.
 ________________________________________
 2. Caching Strategy: Reducing Redundancy
 LLMs are often asked to process identical or similar prompts. We implement a two-layered cache:
 •	Exact Match Cache (Redis): If the News Scout encounters a URL it has already processed in the last 24 hours, it returns the cached "Fact Sheet" instantly without calling the LLM.
 •	Semantic Cache (Vector DB): If a user asks for a blog post on a topic very similar to one generated recently, the Copy Architect retrieves the previous draft as a "Starting Point" or uses it to skip expensive research steps.
 •	Prompt Prefix Caching: For the Copy Architect, we keep the "Brand Voice" and "Style Guide" as a static prefix in the prompt. Modern providers (like Anthropic) allow you to cache these prefixes to reduce input token costs.
 ________________________________________
 3. Batching: Operations for Efficiency
 Batching reduces the overhead of separate network requests and allows for bulk processing.
 •	Tool Batching: If the News Scout finds 5 relevant news items, it doesn't call the "Search Internal Docs" tool 10 times. Instead, it batches the queries into a single Vector Search call to retrieve all relevant technical context at once.
 •	Asynchronous Processing: Use a task queue (like Celery or BullMQ) to batch publishing requests to WordPress, ensuring that a spike in news doesn't trigger a surge in expensive, concurrent LLM calls that might hit rate limits.
 ________________________________________
 4. Budget Rules: Enforcement & Guardrails
 Aden Hive uses granular budget enforcement to prevent "runaway" agent costs.

 https://imgur.com/a/4e3FoIM


 Task 4.3: Observability Dashboard 📊
 Design what metrics should be tracked for your agent system:
 1.	Performance Metrics: (at least 5)
 2.	Quality Metrics: (at least 3)
 3.	Cost Metrics: (at least 3)
 4.	Alert Conditions: When should the system alert humans?
 ________________________________________
 1. Performance Metrics (The "Health" of the System)
 These track the technical efficiency of your worker agents.
 1.	Time to First Token (TTFT): Measures the responsiveness of the LLM for each node (Writer, Scout, etc.).
 2.	Tokens Per Second (TPS): Monitors the "velocity" of content generation.
 3.	Agent Execution Latency (End-to-End): Total time from RSS detection to the final WordPress draft being ready.
 4.	Tool Success Rate: The percentage of successful API calls to WordPress, GitHub, or internal search.
 5.	Queue Depth: Number of news items waiting to be processed by the agents.
 ________________________________________
 2. Quality Metrics (The "Truth" of the Output)
 These ensure the agents are actually doing their jobs well.
 1.	Human Approval Rate: The % of drafts that pass through the Editorial Checkpoint without needing revisions.
 2.	Grounding Accuracy: A metric (often calculated via a "Judge" LLM) that checks if the blog post claims are supported by the retrieved technical docs.
 3.	Self-Healing Recovery Rate: Percentage of runtime failures (e.g., bad formatting) that were successfully fixed by the agent's internal retry logic.
 ________________________________________
 3. Cost Metrics (The "Efficiency" of the Spend)
 These keep the project financially sustainable.
 1.	Cost per Blog Post: The total spend (tokens + tools) required to produce one live article.
 2.	Token Efficiency Ratio: Successful goal completions vs. total tokens consumed.
 3.	Spend by Model Provider: Breakdown of costs between OpenAI (GPT-4), Anthropic (Claude), and Google (Gemini).
 ________________________________________
 4. Alert Conditions (When to Call a Human)
 Automated systems should only bother humans when "Self-Healing" fails or logic drifts dangerously.
 •	Critical: Repeated Self-Healing Failure: Alert if a single node fails and its "evolution" (retry/fix) fails 3 consecutive times.
 •	High: Budget Depletion: Alert when 90% of the daily budget is consumed within the first 6 hours of a day.
 •	Quality: High Rejection Rate: Alert if more than 3 drafts in a row are rejected by the marketing team (suggests the agent's "Brand Voice" has drifted).
 •	Technical: Tool Outage: Alert if a primary tool (like WordPress API) returns a 4xx or 5xx error that persists for more than 10 minutes.
 ________________________________________
No results found