Created
November 28, 2025 13:40
-
-
Save Scheevel/4c7b45259272ec378956b4e142472875 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| ↳ analyst | |
| *elicit a new feature or refactoring that will implement the functionality described @docs/architecture/object-storage-migration.md | |
| - | |
| #3 Tree of Thoughts Deep Dive | |
| - | |
| I like Path 4: Lazy Migration (On-Demand) | |
| - | |
| Critical Questions (Q) to Refine the Approach | |
| Q1: Unaccessed Files | |
| 100% of drawings are accessed regularly | |
| There are very few files currently. | |
| Q2: Migration Completion Criteria | |
| Option A: After 10 days, force-migrate remaining files | |
| Q3: Dual-System Duration | |
| Maintain both volumes for 10 days (can this be scheduled?) | |
| 10 days of tech-debt | |
| Q4: Worker Scaling is not a problem because of short term | |
| - | |
| Option A: Create Implementation Story | |
| - | |
| Naming the Dev Story based on logical epic and story number from @docs/completed-epics.md | |
| ↳ sm | |
| *story-checklist @ 10.4 Don't try to do too much | |
| - | |
| Yes, follow all your recommendations | |
| ↳ qa | |
| *test-design @ 10.4a and @ 10.4b and @ 10.4c and update the stories with your scenarios | |
| ↳ po | |
| *validate-story-draft @ 10.4a @ 10.4b and @ 10.4c and set status to for dev start, or decide if complexity needs it to be shard*validate-story-draft @ and set status to for dev start, or decide if complexity needs it to be shard | |
| ↳ dev | |
| *develop-story @ 10.4a you are authorized to begin and follow closely the QA guidance in the story | |
| ↳ qa | |
| *review and *gate based on scenarios in @ 10.4a | |
| - | |
| Are we OK to deploy this much to local dev? | |
| ↳ deployer | |
| I've stopped all docker containers, now *smart-deploy-local @ 10.5a | |
| - | |
| Check and see how the build is doing now | |
| ↳ dev | |
| *develop-story @ 10.4b you are authorized to begin and follow closely the QA guidance in the story | |
| ↳ qa | |
| *review and *gate based on scenarios in @ 10.4b | |
| ↳ dev | |
| *review-qa @ 10.4b and resolve issues following QA guidance from this chat thread | |
| ↳ qa | |
| *review and *gate based on scenarios in @ 10.4b | |
| ↳ load @deployer | |
| I've stopped all docker containers, now *smart-deploy-local @ 10.4b | |
| - | |
| Check and see how the build is doing now | |
| ↳ dev | |
| ERROR in ./src/pages/MigrationDashboard.tsx 16:0-73 | |
| Module not found: Error: Can't resolve '../services/api' in '/app/src/pages' | |
| ↳ bmad-master | |
| In a previous chat we had discussed the "Deployer" role. Now that we have a web deployment, i asked you what changes should be made to that operation. You ask me the following clarifying quesitons and you recommended a "Hybrid Approach" to extend Deployer to support both local AND web deployment with a *deploy-web command. I suggested changing other name to "*smart-deploy-local" and implment ability to run both. | |
| Clarifying answers were as follows: | |
| 1. Deployment Scope | |
| You tell me, what is best practise here, the Deployer handle BOTH local (Docker Compose) AND web ( ... ) deployments. | |
| 2. Automation Level | |
| Yes, Hybrid: Automate safe operations, require confirmation for critical steps. | |
| 3. Integration with Existing Checklist | |
| Story 10.3 created a comprehensive 10-phase manual deployment checklist, the Deployer should replace the checklist with automated workflow, to the extent it can, by executing the checklist programmatically and verifying outputs. When automation is not advised or constrained, guide through the checklist, prompting the user at each step. | |
| 4. Environment Strategy | |
| An environment strategy will be implemented at a future time, for now a single production environment only and single region. | |
| 5. Smart Deploy for Web | |
| The current *smart-deploy analyzes git changes and rebuilds affected containers. Yes, For ..., should it: | |
| Analyze changes → Determine if backend/frontend/combined app affected → Deploy to ... ? | |
| Integrate with the 3-process architecture (api, worker, beat in one app). Handle the separate frontend app deployment. | |
| But! Soon we will implement the next story @ object-storage-migration.md so allow for that in the future. | |
| 6. Safety & Rollback | |
| We should only protect the data, for now, everything is rebuildable. | |
| 7. ... CLI Integration | |
| Yes, Deployer should do Both: Execute safe commands, generate risky commands for confirmation | |
| 8. Dependency Detection | |
| Current Deployer tracks package.json, requirements.txt changes. Yes, for web deployment, it should also detect: | |
| combined.toml configuration changes | |
| Migration file changes requiring alembic upgrade head | |
| Environment variable/secret changes |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment