Last active
December 10, 2025 18:33
-
-
Save Scheevel/c442bd7640976df17328a5892fb26d83 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| ↳ architect | |
| So, for the first result, somewhere in the database is the name of the image file and the coordinates to the point on the image where that OCR value was discovered, right? | |
| - | |
| Yes, can you fill in the values for deep linking `/drawing/{id}?x={x}&y={y}&zoom={z}` and return to me a valid URL I can use in the browser? | |
| - | |
| That's great, so my expectation is that when I am on the `/search/diagnostic` results page (the screenshot that I shared earlier), and if I choose to click on the first result, it would navigate me to URL that you just provided. How would you describe that interaction, if we were writing a user story? | |
| OK. Let me add a wrinkle, what if there are multiple results, meaning the "Occurences" column has number >1 how would we present to the user multiple "View on Drawing" navigation links to choose from? | |
| ↳ ux | |
| Can you display for me a static .html mockup of how this story spec will appear in the browser? @ 10.3.fix | |
| ↳ analyst | |
| based on @ would you suggest `elicit` or `create-project-brief` to prepare a new Dev Story | |
| Make sure the contents are consistently named "story-11.1..." (it has been renamed several times) | |
| - | |
| To clarify, this story is "11.1" there is another story out there named "10.3.1" however these 2 files are the basis of story "11.1" update accordingly. | |
| - | |
| Yes, #1 Create the dev story now | |
| ↳ architect | |
| Review @ 11.1 does it faithfully reflect @architecture/ | |
| ↳ sm | |
| *story-checklist @ 11.1 Don't try to do too much | |
| ↳ qa | |
| *test-design @ 11.1 and update the story with your scenarios | |
| ↳ po | |
| *validate-story-draft @ 11.1 and set status to for dev start, or decide if complexity needs it to be shard | |
| - | |
| Proceed as single story | |
| ↳ dev | |
| *develop-story @ 11.1 you are authorized to begin and follow closely the QA guidance in the story | |
| - | |
| OK. So I should compact this chat and have you continue on? Is that what you are suggesting? | |
| - | |
| Yes, prepare a handoff summary document and I will start a new chat with the prompt: "Continue implementing Story 11.1: OCR Context Deep Links. Backend is complete with all tests passing. Need to: 1) Update TypeScript interfaces for ContextSample, 2) Update OCRDiagnosticResults component rendering, 3) Add DrawingViewer coordinate highlight support, 4) Add accessibility, 5) E2E tests. Follow test-first approach per QA guidance." | |
| ↳ qa | |
| *review and *gate based on scenarios in @ 11.1 | |
| ↳ architect | |
| Chat me up about how this OCR diagnostic search could be scoped to a single project | |
| - | |
| I agree with your Recommendation, Design Option 1 (Filter Before Fuzzy Matching) & Frontend UX Option B. I'll accept your recommendation on all other architecture | |
| - | |
| Sorry, my goal was only to document your solution, not implement it. Can you roll back your changes and create instead a work document in your `architecture` folder? | |
| ↳ ux | |
| Can you display for me a static .html mockup of how this @architecture/ spec will appear in the browser? | |
| ↳ deployer | |
| I've stopped all docker containers, now *smart-deploy-local @11.1 | |
| ↳ dev | |
| Can you work you use the docs/mockups/story-11.1-ocr-deep-links-mockup.html to create an e2e spec? | |
| You have the Playwright MCP available, can you record 11.1-E2E-002 (P1) and allow me to watch the replay? | |
| http://localhost:3000/reports `Search Text` = "Plate" results provide opportunity to click "View" to bounded-box on drawing | |
| http://localhost:3000/search/diagnostic?query=plate&threshold=0.3&limit=100&include_contexts=true&max_contexts=3 | |
| similar results, and I want the same, click to "View" functionality as the results in `/reports/` | |
| Ask me any clarifying questions | |
| - | |
| With regard to this observation that you made: | |
| ``` | |
| Looking at the code reminders, the "View on Drawing" links exist in the expanded context cards (lines 326-345), but you have to: | |
| Click expand arrow [▼] | |
| Wait for contexts to load | |
| Then click "View on Drawing" | |
| ``` | |
| There can be multiple occurences. Should we implement the expand arrow [▼] to show additional clickable records, so a "view" result exists for each instance? | |
| - | |
| Please rename your document to: `docs/architecture/story-11.2-ocr-diagnostic-variant-navigation.md` | |
| ↳ ux | |
| Can you display for me a static .html mockup of how this @docs/architecture/story-11.2 spec will appear in the browser? | |
| - | |
| Here is the current HTML of the section that will be updated. Can you re-use this in a mockup and apply the changes to be made so I can preview the finished product? | |
| - | |
| That looks great. Update the @docs/architecture/ with any implementation instruction that will be helpful to the developers | |
| ↳ analyst | |
| based on @docs/architecture/story-11.2 do feel we should `elicit` further or move straight to `create-doc` with the `story-tmpl.yaml` template to prepare a new Dev Story in the `/stories/` folder? | |
| - | |
| Yes, proceed with *create-doc using the story template | |
| - | |
| story name should be `docs/stories/11.2-ocr-diagnostic-variant-navigation.md` | |
| section 1 status = draft | |
| section 2 user story is correct | |
| proceed to next section | |
| ↳ sm | |
| *story-checklist @ 11.2 Don't try to do too much | |
| ↳ qa | |
| *test-design @ 11.2 and update the story with your scenarios | |
| ↳ po | |
| *validate-story-draft @ 11.2 and set status to for dev start, or decide if complexity needs it to be shard | |
| ↳ dev | |
| *develop-story @ 11.2 you are authorized to begin and follow closely the QA guidance in the story | |
| ↳ qa | |
| *review and *gate based on scenarios in @ 11.2 | |
| ↳ ux | |
| Can you display for me a static .html mockup of how this @ 10.6 will appear in the browser? | |
| ↳ deployer | |
| I've stopped all docker containers, now *smart-deploy-local @ 11.2 | |
| ↳ dev | |
| regarding the work you completed on @11.2 and navigating to http://localhost:3000/search/diagnostic?query=plate&threshold=0.3&limit=100&include_contexts=true&max_contexts=3 | |
| we would expect to see the funcitionality represeneted in this mockup @ actual-html-preview | |
| But the UI is missing the down-arrow expanding to rows to "View" specifically show in the mockup. | |
| Can you explain to me why? | |
| - | |
| Yes, implement the fix and implement a unit-test to validate this specific issue. | |
| - | |
| This is great. However one more slight issue, we are working within the http://localhost:3000/search/diagnostic URL context, but I noticed the "View on drawing" URL gives a link to https:.../drawings/c9f2f713-15e3-419a-9718-3bbf23c100ee?highlight=5808,739,116,30 | |
| - | |
| We need to make sure that links are within the same server context | |
| - | |
| This looks good, except the expectation is that clicking the "View all results" at the bottom of the screen shot, would simply add to the table, the rows that make up the remainder of the "4 occurences not show" but instead the "View all..." link goes to an undesirable end point. | |
| - | |
| Yes, let me clarify, this was a mistake that in Story 11.1, AC6, the "View All Results" button navigates to the standard search page filtered by the OCR variant. That was NOT the intention, I will be purge that acceptance criteriad and spec. | |
| What I am asking for is the desired behavior - to expand inline and show all remaining occurrences instead of navigating away. | |
| - | |
| Since this is a UX improvement request that changes the original design, I want you to summarize it in such a way that I can hand off to architect to create a new story for to: Fetch and display all remaining contexts inline (requires API changes + new state management) using my acceptance criteria that it should "simply add to the table, the rows that make up the remainder," since this is a non-trivial change that would require: | |
| Removing the max_contexts limit when "View All" is clicked and add state to track which variants have loaded all contexts, refetching from the API with a higher limit, updating the UI to show all contexts. | |
| ↳ architect | |
| Chat me up on this. Although this references prior stories, I think this should be a new dev story to avoid confusion with the prior errant acceptance criteria, what do you think? | |
| ↳ deployer | |
| Yes, mark @11.2 as deployed. | |
| 11.2 kind of replaced @docs/stories/story-11.1-ocr-context-deep-links.md (11.1) had errant acceptance criteria so an inconsistencies between the 2 go with 11.2 | |
| - | |
| commit all changes. Note that this is for 11.1 & 11.2 tag as "known good check point" | |
| ↳ architect | |
| Yes create the (3) Story 11.3 Documents | |
| ↳ ux | |
| 11.3 is very straight forward, anything you want to add? | |
| I like your UX enhancements, please make sure they are included | |
| #1 proceed | |
| ↳ analyst | |
| based on @11.3 does it comply with the `story-tmpl.yaml` template? | |
| - #1Review the Tasks/Subtasks section to ensure all implementation steps are captured | |
| - proceed with option A | |
| - #1 update the story file | |
| ↳ sm | |
| *story-checklist @11.3 Don't try to do too much | |
| ↳ qa | |
| *test-design @11.3 and update the story with your scenarios | |
| ↳ po | |
| *validate-story-draft @11.3 and set status to for dev start, or decide if complexity needs it to be shard | |
| ↳ dev | |
| *develop-story @11.3 you are authorized to begin and follow closely the QA guidance in the story | |
| - | |
| But the html contains this message "Failed to load all contexts. This may be due to a network issue or server error." and "Retry" button does not succeed | |
| ↳ qa | |
| *review and *gate based on scenarios in @11.3 | |
| - | |
| commit all changes, this is for @ tag as "known good check point" |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment