| MTU Size Range | Protocol Efficiency | Contention/Blockage Cost | Fragmentation Risk | Suitable WMN Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very Small (<576 B) | Very Low | Minimal | Zero | Real-time control, VoIP, critical telemetry requiring guaranteed low latency. |
| Constrained Optimum (1300–1400 B) | Medium-High | Moderate | Minimal (Aligned with PMTUD) | Robust multi-hop backhaul, systems using VPN or cellular tunnels (e.g., 1360–1440 bytes). |
| Standard (1452–1500 B) | High | Moderate to High | High (if path has tunnels/PPPoE) | Bulk data transfer, general internet access in non-contested, low-hop scenarios. |
| Too Large (>1500 B, Jumbo) | Maximum Efficiency | Extreme | Guaranteed (unless controlled environment) | Localized, dedicated high-speed links with hardware support for flow control. |
Created
November 24, 2025 05:22
-
-
Save andrewflash/eab96d4dafabaf8b0fd013345c61a094 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Strategic MTU Tuning Recommendations for WMN Applications
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment