Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@daveapex
Last active January 18, 2026 09:11
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save daveapex/0f7644cbe3afcd8852210f45fdfa28c5 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save daveapex/0f7644cbe3afcd8852210f45fdfa28c5 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
REM Tender - Section 1.5: Complaints Management (15%)

REM Energy Services Procurement - L7 Energy Tender Response

Section 1.5: Complaints Management (15%)


πŸ“‘ Tender Response Navigation


Overview

L7 Energy operates a structured complaints management framework combining a dedicated Customer Service team, our integrated Loop Case Management system, and MS Teams collaboration to ensure rapid, transparent, and auditable resolution of all queries and complaints.

This aligns to the Service Matrix (Annex 4) as applicable.


Complaints Management Infrastructure

Dedicated Customer Service Team

L7 Energy maintains a dedicated Customer Service (CS) team responsible for:

  • First-line query handling and triage
  • Complaint logging and categorisation
  • Progress tracking and stakeholder communication
  • Escalation management
  • Resolution verification and closure

Team Structure:

Role Responsibility
CS Coordinator Daily queue management, SLA monitoring, escalation triggers
CS Analysts Query investigation, data validation, response preparation
Technical Specialists Complex billing, metering, and calculation queries
Account Manager Escalation point, client liaison, trend reporting

Loop Case Management Module

Our Loop platform includes a purpose-built Case Management module providing:

Loop Platform Architecture:
β”œβ”€β”€ Core Module (API, authentication)
β”œβ”€β”€ Calculation Module (consumption calculations)
β”œβ”€β”€ Case-Management Module ← Complaints & queries
└── Document Module (evidence attachment)

Case Management Features:

Feature Capability
Case logging Structured intake with categorisation, priority, and routing
Audit trail Every action timestamped with user identity
Document attachment Link evidence (meter photos, bills, correspondence) to cases
SLA tracking Automated alerts for approaching deadlines
Status workflow Open β†’ In Progress β†’ Awaiting Info β†’ Resolved β†’ Closed
Reporting Case volumes, resolution times, root cause analysis

MS Teams Integration

L7 Energy uses Microsoft Teams for real-time collaboration:

  • Dedicated REM channel for client-facing communication
  • Internal escalation channels for rapid specialist involvement
  • Notification alerts for priority cases
  • Video conferencing for complex query resolution
  • Document sharing with version control

Complaints Process and Workflow

Stage 1: Receipt and Logging

Step Action Timeframe
1.1 Complaint received (email, phone, portal, Teams) T+0
1.2 Logged in Loop Case Management with unique reference Within 1 hour
1.3 Categorised and prioritised Within 1 hour
1.4 Acknowledgement sent to complainant Within 4 hours

Categorisation:

  • Priority 1 (Urgent): Service disruption, regulatory deadline, significant financial impact
  • Priority 2 (High): Billing dispute, data accuracy concern, escalated complaint
  • Priority 3 (Standard): General query, information request, minor correction

Stage 2: Investigation

Step Action Timeframe
2.1 Assigned to appropriate team member Within 4 hours
2.2 Initial investigation and data gathering Within 1 business day
2.3 Root cause identification Within 2 business days
2.4 Progress update to complainant (if complex) Within 2 business days

Investigation Tools:

  • Loop platform audit trails for calculation history
  • Versioned calculation records showing what changed
  • Meter reading evidence (photos, timestamps)
  • Supplier bill documentation
  • Historical correspondence

Stage 3: Resolution

Step Action Timeframe
3.1 Resolution action determined Within 3 business days
3.2 Correction applied (if required) Within 3 business days
3.3 Response prepared with explanation Within 4 business days
3.4 Response sent to complainant Within 5 business days

Stage 4: Closure and Learning

Step Action Timeframe
4.1 Complainant confirmation of satisfaction Within 2 days of response
4.2 Case closed in system Upon confirmation
4.3 Root cause logged for trend analysis At closure
4.4 Process improvement identified (if applicable) Monthly review

Service Level Agreements

Turnaround Times

Metric Target Measurement
Acknowledgement Within 4 hours Time from receipt to acknowledgement sent
Initial Response Within 1 business day Time from receipt to substantive first response
Resolution (Standard) Within 5 business days Time from receipt to resolution communicated
Resolution (Complex) Within 10 business days Complex cases requiring supplier/third-party input
Escalated Cases Within 3 business days Cases escalated to Account Manager

Priority-Based SLAs

Priority Acknowledgement First Response Resolution
P1 - Urgent 1 hour 4 hours 2 business days
P2 - High 4 hours 1 business day 5 business days
P3 - Standard 4 hours 2 business days 10 business days

Escalation Procedures

Escalation Triggers

Trigger Action
SLA breach approaching Automated alert to CS Coordinator
Complainant dissatisfaction Escalate to Account Manager
Repeated complaint (same issue) Root cause review triggered
Regulatory or legal implication Immediate escalation to Account Director
Financial impact >Β£5,000 Account Manager involvement

Escalation Path

Level 1: CS Analyst
    ↓ (unresolved after 3 days or complainant request)
Level 2: CS Coordinator / Technical Specialist
    ↓ (unresolved after 5 days or complainant dissatisfaction)
Level 3: Account Manager
    ↓ (unresolved after 7 days or significant impact)
Level 4: Account Director
    ↓ (regulatory/legal or reputational risk)
Level 5: Managing Director

Loop Platform: Complaint Resolution Advantage

Our Loop platform's immutable data architecture provides unique advantages for complaint resolution:

Capability Complaint Resolution Benefit
Versioned calculations Show exactly what was calculated, when, and why it changed
Audit trail Every reading, calculation, and adjustment traceable
Evidence attachment Meter photos, supplier bills linked to records
Adjustment journal Transparent corrections with mandatory reasons
Historical recreation Can recreate any past calculation state

Example Resolution:

"Your May bill was calculated using reading 12,450 kWh taken on 30 April (photo attached). This was calculation version 2, replacing version 1 which used an estimated reading. The adjustment of -Β£45.20 reflects the difference and was approved on 15 May. Full audit trail attached."

This level of transparency reduces complaint volumes and accelerates resolution by providing immediate, evidence-based answers.


Reporting and Continuous Improvement

Monthly Reporting

Report Content
Case Volume Total cases, by category, by building
SLA Performance % within target, average resolution time
Root Cause Analysis Top complaint categories, systemic issues
Trend Analysis Month-on-month comparison, emerging patterns
Escalation Summary Cases escalated, reasons, outcomes

Continuous Improvement

  • Monthly review of complaint trends with REM
  • Quarterly deep-dive into root causes and process improvements
  • Feedback loop from complaints to system enhancements
  • Training updates based on common query types

Alignment to Heat Networks Consumer Protection Expectations

Our complaints management framework is designed to meet the consumer protection expectations of the Heat Networks (Market Framework) Regulations 2025:

  • Signposting – Clear information provided to complainants on escalation routes, including Energy Ombudsman where applicable
  • Escalation procedures – Documented escalation path with defined timeframes and accountability
  • Evidence retention – All complaints, investigations, and resolutions retained with full audit trail for regulatory review
  • Reporting to REM – Monthly complaint summaries, root cause analysis, and trend reporting provided to REM
  • Regulator readiness – Complaint data structured for Ofgem reporting requirements; evidence readily accessible for regulatory audit

This ensures REM is positioned to demonstrate consumer protection compliance under the regulated heat network regime.


Summary

L7 Energy's complaints management framework delivers:

βœ… Rapid response – 4-hour acknowledgement, 5-day resolution target

βœ… Full visibility – Loop Case Management with audit trail

βœ… Evidence-based resolution – Immutable data enables transparent answers

βœ… Clear escalation – Defined path from analyst to director

βœ… Continuous improvement – Monthly reporting and root cause analysis

βœ… Multi-channel access – Email, phone, portal, MS Teams

Our integrated approach ensures complaints are resolved quickly, transparently, and with full documentationβ€”reducing repeat queries and building stakeholder confidence.


[End of Section 1.5]


πŸ“‘ Navigation

Previous: ← Section 1.4: Procurement Strategy
Next: Section 1.6: Handover & Mobilisation β†’

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment