Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@daveapex
Last active January 18, 2026 09:11
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save daveapex/bc8a4c44a13c263ddf813a8de4d95fb6 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save daveapex/bc8a4c44a13c263ddf813a8de4d95fb6 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
REM Tender - Section 1.4: Procurement Strategy (15%)

REM Energy Services Procurement - L7 Energy Tender Response

Section 1.4: Procurement Strategy (15%)


πŸ“‘ Tender Response Navigation


Understanding of the UKGBC Gold Standard for Energy Procurement

L7 Energy understands the UKGBC Gold Standard for energy procurement as a best-practice framework requiring that energy procurement decisions are:

  • Strategically aligned to net zero and decarbonisation pathways
  • Transparent, competitive, and well-governed
  • Based on whole-life value rather than short-term price alone
  • Proportionate, evidence-based, and defensible
  • Designed to minimise unintended cost and risk transfer to occupiers

We recognise that UKGBC Gold Standard procurement emphasises process quality and decision governance, not simply the selection of "green" tariffs.

This aligns to the Service Matrix (Annex 4) as applicable.


Procurement Methodology and Governance

L7 Energy applies a structured procurement methodology designed to meet UKGBC Gold Standard expectations while minimising cost and risk to landlords and occupiers.

1. Market Timing and Strategy

Element Approach
Flexible procurement windows Informed by real-time market conditions and forward curve analysis
Scenario analysis Comparing fixed, flexible, and blended purchasing strategies
Volatility management Avoidance of unnecessary long-term price fixing during periods of high volatility
Market intelligence Regular briefings on wholesale market movements and their implications

2. Risk Management

Risk Category Management Approach
Wholesale price volatility Formal assessment and scenario modelling
Contract rigidity Evaluation of break clauses and flexibility options
Counterparty risk Supplier financial resilience assessment
Risk allocation Explicit consideration of how procurement risk is allocated between landlord and occupier
Long-term exposure Avoidance of strategies that embed unmanaged cost exposure

3. Supplier Selection

  • Competitive tendering with documented evaluation criteria
  • Assessment of supplier financial resilience, ESG credentials, and reporting capability
  • Preference for suppliers able to support transparent billing, audit trails, and sustainability reporting
  • Evaluation of supplier alignment with Heat Networks Regulations and other emerging requirements

4. Transparency and Auditability

Our Loop platform supports UKGBC Gold Standard procurement through:

  • Documented procurement rationale aligned to UKGBC principles
  • Clear audit trail of decisions, assumptions, and trade-offs
  • Procurement outputs designed to support wider ESG, SECR, and stakeholder reporting
  • Version-controlled decision records ensuring defensibility

Sustainability and Cost Control

L7 Energy balances sustainability objectives with affordability by:

Principle Application
No "green premium by default" Sustainability options evaluated on merit, not assumed
Total-cost comparison Renewable and non-renewable options compared on whole-life cost and risk basis
REGO-backed renewable electricity Selected where it delivers demonstrable value
Proportionate decisions Sustainability aligned to asset type, occupancy model, and resident impact

This approach ensures alignment with UKGBC Gold Standard without imposing unnecessary cost on landlords or occupiers.


Evidence: UKGBC Gold Standard Procurement Strategies

Case Study 1: Build-to-Rent Residential Portfolio

Context: 850-unit BTR portfolio across 3 London developments

Approach:

  • Competitive electricity procurement aligned to UKGBC decision-making principles
  • Market-timed procurement using blended fixing strategy to manage volatility
  • Renewable electricity selected following comprehensive cost and risk comparison
  • Resident impact assessment ensuring affordability

Evidence of Gold Standard Alignment:

UKGBC Principle Evidence
Transparent supplier selection Documented tender process with scored evaluation
Risk management Blended fixing reduced exposure to wholesale volatility
Cost control for residents Avoided green premium; renewable option competitive on total cost
Decarbonisation alignment 100% REGO-backed supply supporting Scope 2 reporting

Governance Artefacts:

  • Tender pack with evaluation matrix and scoring criteria
  • Decision paper with board/stakeholder approvals
  • Risk register including hedging plan and volatility scenarios

Outcome: 8% cost saving vs. incumbent supplier; 100% renewable; documented audit trail


Case Study 2: Mixed-Use Estate with Communal Energy Systems

Context: Mixed-use estate comprising office, retail, and residential with district heat network

Approach:

  • Estate-wide procurement strategy covering communal and landlord supplies
  • Supplier evaluation weighted for ESG credentials, reporting capability, and governance
  • Explicit avoidance of over-specification that would increase occupier cost
  • Procurement designed to support Heat Networks Regulations compliance

Evidence of Gold Standard Alignment:

UKGBC Principle Evidence
Whole-estate perspective Single coordinated strategy across all uses
Proportional sustainability Renewable options evaluated per use-type; not mandated universally
Clear governance Procurement board approval with documented rationale
Audit trail Decision matrix retained for regulatory and stakeholder queries

Governance Artefacts:

  • Tender pack with weighted evaluation criteria (price, ESG, reporting)
  • Decision paper documenting trade-offs and proportionality rationale
  • Risk register covering counterparty and regulatory compliance risks

Outcome: Consolidated supplier relationship; improved reporting capability; no cost escalation


Case Study 3: Multi-Site Landlord Portfolio

Context: 12-building London office portfolio under single ownership

Approach:

  • Aggregated demand across multiple assets to improve pricing leverage
  • Competitive tendering supported by documented evaluation criteria
  • Procurement outcomes aligned to landlord sustainability targets without cost escalation
  • Staged contract structure enabling market re-entry at optimal points

Evidence of Gold Standard Alignment:

UKGBC Principle Evidence
Value through aggregation Portfolio buying power reduced unit rates by 6%
Reduced risk exposure Shorter contract terms with defined review windows
Transparent decision-making Evaluation criteria shared with all bidders; scoring documented
Sustainability integration Carbon reporting capability included in supplier requirements

Governance Artefacts:

  • Aggregated tender pack with portfolio demand analysis
  • Decision paper with evaluation scoring and recommendation
  • Risk register including contract term and market re-entry strategy

Outcome: Β£180,000 annual saving; enhanced reporting; defensible procurement record


Integration with Loop Platform

Our procurement approach is supported by the Loop platform's data capabilities:

Capability Procurement Benefit
Historical consumption analytics Accurate demand forecasting for procurement
Multi-site aggregation Portfolio-level demand visibility for bulk purchasing
Supplier bill validation Verification that contracted rates are correctly applied
Carbon reporting Automated Scope 2 calculations supporting REGO verification
Audit trail Procurement decisions linked to consumption data and outcomes

Summary

L7 Energy delivers UKGBC Gold Standard energy procurement by applying:

βœ… Structured market engagement – Timing, scenarios, and competitive tendering

βœ… Formal risk management – Volatility, counterparty, and allocation assessment

βœ… Transparent governance – Documented decisions, audit trails, defensible rationale

βœ… Proportionate sustainability – Green options evaluated on merit, not assumed

This ensures procurement outcomes support decarbonisation objectives while minimising cost and risk to both landlords and occupiers.


[End of Section 1.4]


πŸ“‘ Navigation

Previous: ← Section 1.3: Recharge Strategy
Next: Section 1.5: Complaints Management β†’

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment