{
  "coverage_gaps": [],
  "planner_error": "[Errno 7] Argument list too long: 'codex'",
  "recommended_provider_mix": [],

{
  "coverage_gaps": [],
  "planner_error": "[Errno 7] Argument list too long: 'codex'",
  "recommended_provider_mix": [],

{
  "coverage_gaps": [
    "No dedicated track for .memory docs updates; they are explanatory and low risk compared with the runtime changes.",
    "No separate test-only track; the tests are treated as evidence within each owned risk surface rather than reviewed independently.",

{
  "coverage_gaps": [],
  "planner_error": "[Errno 7] Argument list too long: 'codex'",
  "recommended_provider_mix": [],

{
  "coverage_gaps": [
    "The `.memory/*` additions are not worth a dedicated review track; they document the bug but do not change runtime behavior.",
    "This plan does not spend a separate track on unit tests themselves; test sufficiency is reviewed inside each owning runtime track because the change is small and behavior-centric.",

{
  "coverage_gaps": [],
  "planner_error": "[Errno 7] Argument list too long: 'codex'",
  "recommended_provider_mix": [],

{
  "coverage_gaps": [],
  "planner_error": "[Errno 7] Argument list too long: 'codex'",
  "recommended_provider_mix": [],

{
  "coverage_gaps": [
    "No separate track for log removal or TypeScript nullability cleanup because those are mechanical and fully covered by the bootstrap and harness tracks.",
    "No per-attack decomposition inside the security test file because the meaningful risk clusters are authorization contract correctness and event-collection reliability, not each individual test block.",

{
  "coverage_gaps": [
    "No separate track for broader OpenCode runtime behavior because the diff is narrowly scoped to port-file path resolution and can be held in one reviewer's head.",
    "No separate track for docs/config rollout because the request is to plan review from this code diff, and the dominant risk is behavioral correctness in the adapter itself."

{
  "coverage_gaps": [
    "No separate track for test quality; the test surface is small enough to review inside the two behavior tracks.",
    "No integration/runtime track for Docker or actual sidecar startup because the diff is narrow and the main review risk is semantic regression, not orchestration plumbing volume.",