Calvin elbartostrikesagain

Given address ids 1,2,3, we would want a single query to returns rows for every combination of directions, ie:

1,2
1,3
2,1
2,3
3,1
3,2

	it "maintains acceptable performance for the index action", skip_db_cleaner: true do # for some reason skip_db_cleaner: true when running the whole test suite wasn't being inherited, so I had to dup it :( . When running the describe, it was being inherited by the 'it' blocks, and once you run it and try to run the whole suite again, it starts passing.
	expect { get :index, params: params, format: :json }.to meet_performance_threshold(4.0)
	.sample(5)
	.under_standard_deviations(2)

	# Also see rspec-benchmark. This matcher is like perform_under but it removes results outside a defined standard deviation range reduce high variance.
	RSpec::Matchers.define :meet_performance_threshold do \|threshold_seconds\|
	chain :sample do \|sample_size\|
	@with_sample_size = sample_size
	end

	var Mocha = require('mocha'),
	fs = require('fs'),
	_ = require('underscore');

	var mocha = new Mocha({reporter: 'spec', ui: 'bdd'});

	mocha.addPath = function(dir){
	fs.readdirSync(dir).filter(function(file){
	var fileArray = file.split('.');

	Rails => Geddy

	Models
	User.new(params) => User.create(params);
	-----
	User.create(params) => var u = User.create(params);
	// saves the user then calls the callback function
	u.save(function (err, data) { // do things });
	-----

	RSpec::Matchers.define :encrypt do \|attribute\|
	encrypted_attribute = ('encrypted_' + attribute.to_s)


	match do \|model\|
	model.respond_to?(attribute) && model.respond_to?(encrypted_attribute.intern) && model.class.column_names.include?(encrypted_attribute)
	end

	failure_message_for_should do \|model\|
	unless model.class.column_names.include?(encrypted_attribute)