Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@fronbasal
Created November 7, 2025 00:56
Show Gist options
  • Select an option

  • Save fronbasal/095865c6e6930e3685c729bfcfbea249 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Save fronbasal/095865c6e6930e3685c729bfcfbea249 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
NVMe Performance / Hoster Comparison / Netcup vs. Hetzner Cloud vs. IONOS
Metric IONOS 1&1 (beta.txt) Hetzner (pretix.txt) Netcup (detroit.txt)
Read IOPS 5010 (+99.3% vs Netcup, +17.5% vs Hetzner) 4264 (+69.6% vs Netcup) 2514 (baseline)
Write IOPS 2150 (+99.1% vs Netcup, +17.5% vs Hetzner) 1830 (+69.4% vs Netcup) 1080 (baseline)
Read Bandwidth (MB/s) 20.5 (+99.0% vs Netcup, +17.1% vs Hetzner) 17.5 (+69.9% vs Netcup) 10.3 (baseline)
Write Bandwidth (MB/s) 8.8 (+104.7% vs Netcup, +20.5% vs Hetzner) 7.3 (+69.8% vs Netcup) 4.3 (baseline)
Avg Latency Read (us) 167 (-27.4% vs Netcup, -1.2% vs Hetzner) 169 (-26.5% vs Netcup) 230 (baseline)
Avg Latency Write (us) 73 (-80.9% vs Netcup, -50.7% vs Hetzner) 148 (-61.3% vs Netcup) 382 (baseline)
  • IONOS 1&1 has the best SSD performance overall, about twice the random IOPS and bandwidth compared to Netcup and 17-20% better than Hetzner.
  • Hetzner performs significantly better than Netcup in all metrics but is outperformed by IONOS 1&1.
  • Netcup offers the lowest performance and highest latency.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment