huttj · October 10, 2025 18:58
diff --git a/ireland_art_initiative.json b/ireland_art_initiative.json
 {
 "axes": [
 {
 "label": "Openness",
 "positive": "Curious, dialogical, charitable",
 "negative": "Closed / tribal / hostile"
 },
 {
 "label": "Evidence Rigor",
 "positive": "Cites sources, falsifiable claims, precision",
 "negative": "Anecdote, vibes, imprecision"
 },
 {
 "label": "Value Framing",
 "positive": "Material/ROI/instrumental value",
 "negative": "Intrinsic/wellbeing/non-monetary value"
 },
 {
 "label": "Institutional Trust",
 "positive": "Trusts studies/government process",
 "negative": "Distrustful/conspiratorial"
 },
 {
 "label": "Redistribution Attitude",
 "positive": "Pro-subsidy/UBI/public arts",
 "negative": "Anti-tax/market-only"
 },
 {
 "label": "Tone Polarity",
 "positive": "Sincere/constructive",
 "negative": "Sarcastic/contemptuous"
 },
 {
 "label": "National Identity Orientation",
 "positive": "Nativist/protectionist/nation-first",
 "negative": "Cosmopolitan/global/open-borders"
 },
 {
 "label": "Policy Pragmatism",
 "positive": "Nuanced/feasibility-minded",
 "negative": "Utopian/fatalistic/trolling"
 }
 ],
 "data": [
 {
 "id": "T1",
 "author": "@lapislagoons",
 "emoji": "🎨",
 "text": "Ireland passed a living wage for artists, they found for every $1 invested in artist the artists returned $1.39 back, and so they are rolling out a program of basic income for artist, incredible",
 "estimation": "Aspirational policy claim tying arts funding to quantified social ROI; implicitly defends art-as-public-good and signals moral approval of redistribution.",
 "coords": [
 70,
 -10,
 -40,
 35,
 80,
 65,
 -20,
 25
 ],
 "replies_to": null
 },
 {
 "id": "T2",
 "author": "@LexerLux",
 "emoji": "🧮",
 "text": "They actually found that each €1.00 invested only made €0.23 in returns, so they added €80,000,000 of 'psychological value' in order to make it profitable. Remember that if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.",
 "estimation": "Methodological pushback emphasizing measurement rigor and skepticism toward wellbeing monetization; implicitly defends market-real ROI standards.",
 "coords": [
 -10,
 85,
 80,
 -35,
 -60,
 -15,
 5,
 55
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T3",
 "author": "@lapislagoons",
 "emoji": "🧘‍♀️",
 "text": "maybe not all value is monetary",
 "estimation": "Reframes to intrinsic value; implicitly protects symbolic/affective goods from market reduction.",
 "coords": [
 60,
 -40,
 -85,
 20,
 70,
 55,
 -15,
 25
 ],
 "replies_to": "T2"
 },
 {
 "id": "T4",
 "author": "@ruedaminute",
 "emoji": "🙏",
 "text": "amazing, thanks for calling this out!",
 "estimation": "Affirms the debunk; implicitly values epistemic hygiene over hype.",
 "coords": [
 35,
 50,
 55,
 -10,
 -30,
 40,
 0,
 45
 ],
 "replies_to": "T2"
 },
 {
 "id": "T5",
 "author": "@lapislagoons",
 "emoji": "🔗",
 "text": "thank you for linking!",
 "estimation": "Bridges to evidence contributors; signals openness and collaborative stance.",
 "coords": [
 80,
 25,
 -30,
 35,
 65,
 75,
 -10,
 45
 ],
 "replies_to": "T10"
 },
 {
 "id": "T6",
 "author": "@nnicosuave",
 "emoji": "❓",
 "text": "this is awesome, what do they consider an 'artist'?",
 "estimation": "Curious inquiry about eligibility; implicitly seeks definitional clarity to avoid scope creep.",
 "coords": [
 70,
 40,
 10,
 25,
 40,
 60,
 0,
 65
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T7",
 "author": "@lapislagoons",
 "emoji": "📋",
 "text": "you have to be a resident of Ireland and working for at least three years in a list of artistic ventures",
 "estimation": "Provides criteria; implicitly counters fears of lax gatekeeping.",
 "coords": [
 65,
 45,
 -20,
 35,
 60,
 70,
 5,
 70
 ],
 "replies_to": "T6"
 },
 {
 "id": "T8",
 "author": "@VenemousTurnip",
 "emoji": "🧪",
 "text": "Did they? Thought it was just a pilot program to assess if it made a difference?",
 "estimation": "Cautious correction; foregrounds program stage and evidence thresholds.",
 "coords": [
 40,
 55,
 20,
 15,
 0,
 35,
 0,
 60
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T9",
 "author": "@lapislagoons",
 "emoji": "🚀",
 "text": "they’ve moved on to implementation due to the success of the pilot program !",
 "estimation": "Asserts progression to rollout; implicitly trusts institutional evaluation of the pilot.",
 "coords": [
 60,
 20,
 -20,
 45,
 70,
 65,
 -5,
 55
 ],
 "replies_to": "T8"
 },
 {
 "id": "T10",
 "author": "@cavi_jointleman",
 "emoji": "🔍",
 "text": "I was having a bit of a hard believing that such a specific study exists, but wow it's real! So good to have this kind of data! From almaeconomics.com",
 "estimation": "Source-checking and surprise; implicitly valorizes empirical backing for pro-arts claims.",
 "coords": [
 65,
 60,
 15,
 35,
 45,
 70,
 -5,
 65
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T11",
 "author": "@Maria__Falbo",
 "emoji": "🤩",
 "text": "is this for real? awesome 🙏🏻",
 "estimation": "Enthusiastic verification-seeking; emotionally supportive of policy.",
 "coords": [
 55,
 20,
 -25,
 15,
 55,
 75,
 -10,
 35
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T12",
 "author": "@BlueTiefling",
 "emoji": "📻",
 "text": "what's funny is that art helped pull America out of the great depression too\n\nbut we stopped funding it\nart gives hope, it gives every day people a voice that others can actually hear or see or feel\ngood on Ireland for putting money in the arts",
 "estimation": "Historical appeal (WPA-era) linking arts to social morale; implicitly counters austerity narratives.",
 "coords": [
 70,
 25,
 -45,
 20,
 80,
 80,
 -20,
 45
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T13",
 "author": "@ProjectionArte",
 "emoji": "🧳",
 "text": "On my way",
 "estimation": "Playful migration fantasy; affirms desirability of policy environment.",
 "coords": [
 50,
 -10,
 -20,
 10,
 45,
 60,
 -25,
 10
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T14",
 "author": "@majamediaco",
 "emoji": "😄",
 "text": "that’s so cool",
 "estimation": "Simple valence-positive boost; minimal argument.",
 "coords": [
 55,
 -20,
 -30,
 10,
 55,
 70,
 -10,
 15
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T15",
 "author": "@adrparkinson",
 "emoji": "📈",
 "text": "I'm assuming most of the artists will be doing commission work which ordinarily wouldn't have been able to support them fully. This means that they'll now be bringing more money into the country. Now how do we convince governments around the world to do the same thing?",
 "estimation": "Mechanism sketch plus policy scaling; implicitly pro-subsidy with trade balance optimism.",
 "coords": [
 65,
 45,
 30,
 25,
 75,
 70,
 -20,
 70
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T16",
 "author": "@intuitionsoup",
 "emoji": "🏡",
 "text": "Maybe I should move there",
 "estimation": "Signals policy-driven migration preference; implies comparative governance legitimacy.",
 "coords": [
 55,
 -10,
 -20,
 15,
 50,
 60,
 -25,
 25
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T17",
 "author": "@War_Lizard",
 "emoji": "⚖️",
 "text": "The 1.39 returned is based on WELLBY, a 5-year-old report that says a 1% increase in life satisfaction = 13k British pounds per year.\n\nIt's highly controversial.",
 "estimation": "Specific methodological critique of WELLBY monetization; implicitly guards against policy justified by soft metrics.",
 "coords": [
 10,
 80,
 75,
 -25,
 -35,
 10,
 5,
 60
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T18",
 "author": "@Seraph_Notitia",
 "emoji": "🛟",
 "text": "Wow ur saved @providenceluvr",
 "estimation": "Playful address; implicit approval of targeted benefit for artists.",
 "coords": [
 40,
 -20,
 -25,
 5,
 45,
 55,
 -10,
 20
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T19",
 "author": "@baciarski",
 "emoji": "💹",
 "text": "that's 39% ROI, impressive",
 "estimation": "Takes claim at face value; equates social ROI with market ROI.",
 "coords": [
 35,
 10,
 85,
 15,
 35,
 55,
 0,
 40
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T20",
 "author": "@BriscoeCale",
 "emoji": "🖌️",
 "text": "I predicted this!\nQuote\nCale @BriscoeCale · Oct 2\nReplying to @majamediaco\n10% tax on non artists that gets evenly split among registered artists \n\nUniversal Brushstroke Income",
 "estimation": "Self-quoting utopian redistribution concept; leans playful but advocates strong transfer scheme to artists.",
 "coords": [
 45,
 5,
 -25,
 10,
 85,
 45,
 -10,
 -10
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T21",
 "author": "@Byrnkastal",
 "emoji": "🧂",
 "text": "Seems very wishful thinking. I’ve found the most gifted artists and creatives able to produce absolute majesty- but alongside that is a great deal of (oftentimes well-intentioned) slop that just isn’t good.\n\nI don’t think a program like this can prevent itself from being abused",
 "estimation": "Quality variance and moral hazard concern; implicitly defends gatekeeping and scarcity discipline.",
 "coords": [
 5,
 40,
 40,
 -10,
 -25,
 10,
 5,
 55
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T22",
 "author": "@anasuachara",
 "emoji": "🌱",
 "text": "That’s amazing! It’s great to see a country actually valuing artists and recognizing their impact. Investing in creativity really does give back more than people expect.",
 "estimation": "Warm pro-arts affirmation; endorses positive-sum externalities.",
 "coords": [
 70,
 10,
 -35,
 25,
 80,
 80,
 -20,
 45
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T23",
 "author": "@JohnIVSobieski",
 "emoji": "🏦",
 "text": "Why aren't banks doing this if the returns are so high?",
 "estimation": "Market test challenge; implies skepticism toward public-justified ROI.",
 "coords": [
 10,
 55,
 70,
 -15,
 -40,
 15,
 0,
 65
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T24",
 "author": "@georgecursor",
 "emoji": "🧢",
 "text": "Ah yes UBI for artists. Sure, why not",
 "estimation": "Dry sarcasm; frames as special pleading for a class.",
 "coords": [
 -25,
 5,
 35,
 -20,
 -45,
 -40,
 5,
 -10
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T25",
 "author": "@ThePeoples53471",
 "emoji": "🌍",
 "text": "Livable wages for all people everywhere",
 "estimation": "Universalist redistribution claim; broad moral horizon beyond artists.",
 "coords": [
 65,
 -15,
 -40,
 10,
 95,
 65,
 -30,
 10
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T26",
 "author": "@AIdenAIStar",
 "emoji": "🧠",
 "text": "Ah, yes, the famous 80 million of psychological value. Not made up at all",
 "estimation": "Mocking the wellbeing imputation; implies fabrication or padding.",
 "coords": [
 -30,
 50,
 70,
 -35,
 -55,
 -55,
 0,
 15
 ],
 "replies_to": "T2"
 },
 {
 "id": "T27",
 "author": "@whotfisjovana",
 "emoji": "🚫🇺🇸",
 "text": "US would NEVER… Ireland is progressing light years ahead.",
 "estimation": "Comparative national critique; valorizes Ireland, disparages US political feasibility.",
 "coords": [
 25,
 -10,
 -25,
 15,
 60,
 30,
 -15,
 -5
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T28",
 "author": "@Hemph_jay",
 "emoji": "😲",
 "text": "I’ve been thinking this is the way to go for art for while, I’m shocked it’s a reality already. Wow",
 "estimation": "Surprised approval; norm-entrenching for arts support.",
 "coords": [
 65,
 -10,
 -30,
 20,
 70,
 70,
 -10,
 35
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T29",
 "author": "@mwstateofmind",
 "emoji": "♾️",
 "text": "That being the case they can spend billions and make a nice return. No need to do anything else as this is a perpetual money making machine!",
 "estimation": "Reductio ad absurdum of claimed ROI; warns against naive extrapolation.",
 "coords": [
 -15,
 45,
 65,
 -20,
 -30,
 -35,
 0,
 -20
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T30",
 "author": "@HomosapienMouse",
 "emoji": "🧾",
 "text": "Ya that's cool and all, but don't get the wrong idea, they just put out the budget for 2026 and everyone else is still getting absolutely shafted even worse than last year. More tax cuts for companies, normal people pay the price, on top of a list of other things.",
 "estimation": "Contextualizes within broader budget politics; pro-people redistribution, anti-corporate tax cuts.",
 "coords": [
 35,
 35,
 -10,
 -5,
 65,
 10,
 0,
 55
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T31",
 "author": "@27khv",
 "emoji": "🍀",
 "text": "It’s almost an act of national penance...Ireland spent the 20th century driving its artists abroad, now it’s paying them to stay",
 "estimation": "Narrative of historical redress; national self-critique turned pro-arts policy.",
 "coords": [
 55,
 10,
 -35,
 20,
 70,
 70,
 -5,
 40
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T32",
 "author": "@Jay8142",
 "emoji": "🪆",
 "text": "Nice, and now you have to paint commissar approved work (if not now eventually).",
 "estimation": "Slippery-slope to state censorship; conflates subsidy with control.",
 "coords": [
 -40,
 30,
 55,
 -50,
 -55,
 -60,
 15,
 10
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T33",
 "author": "@MAPatriot1630",
 "emoji": "🥴",
 "text": "By that logic they should just pay everyone 100MM until they're are the richest country in the world.",
 "estimation": "Parodic reductio; attacks ROI logic as incoherent.",
 "coords": [
 -30,
 35,
 70,
 -25,
 -50,
 -50,
 15,
 -30
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T34",
 "author": "@Scribblybloke",
 "emoji": "🍁",
 "text": "Arts funding is so important. It’s a shame most places are being overrun with US exports so politicians don’t think it is important to their national identity.",
 "estimation": "Cultural sovereignty argument; ties arts funding to national identity against foreign media hegemony.",
 "coords": [
 45,
 25,
 -25,
 15,
 65,
 55,
 45,
 45
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T35",
 "author": "@Di4mondD4y",
 "emoji": "🧩",
 "text": "I don't get it, they force artists to pay themselves more money that they don't have? Or is this 'ubi for artists?'",
 "estimation": "Confusion about mechanism; skeptical framing of targeted UBI.",
 "coords": [
 10,
 25,
 35,
 -10,
 -25,
 5,
 0,
 30
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T36",
 "author": "@*esk_kse*",
 "emoji": "🚫🌍",
 "text": "Noooooo you can’t just subsidise local industry!! We need that money for Somalians",
 "estimation": "Hostile nativist jab leveraging anti-immigrant resentment; tribal boundary policing.",
 "coords": [
 -90,
 -20,
 25,
 -45,
 -70,
 -85,
 85,
 -35
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T37",
 "author": "@kashapov_timur_",
 "emoji": "🧪📉",
 "text": "even though it's good news and should applauded, the very idea of 'return' from creative industry has absolutely no valid methodology — every country has its '1 invested - 1,x returned'",
 "estimation": "Meta-methodology critique; warns about politicized impact multipliers.",
 "coords": [
 20,
 70,
 65,
 -20,
 10,
 15,
 0,
 65
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T38",
 "author": "@katiehov",
 "emoji": "🗓️",
 "text": "they also had a successful pilot project for a four day workweek and productivity was either sustained or improved ❤️☘️",
 "estimation": "Generalizes institutional reform success; pro-social policy and optimism bias.",
 "coords": [
 65,
 35,
 -30,
 35,
 70,
 80,
 -15,
 45
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T39",
 "author": "@justmebrett",
 "emoji": "🌈",
 "text": "Such a wonderful step in the right direction.",
 "estimation": "Normative endorsement; low informational content.",
 "coords": [
 65,
 -20,
 -35,
 20,
 75,
 75,
 -10,
 20
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T40",
 "author": "@afuturemodern",
 "emoji": "🏆",
 "text": "artists outperforming your favorite hedge fund",
 "estimation": "Boastful counter-frame using finance metaphor; collapses social ROI into alpha.",
 "coords": [
 25,
 15,
 80,
 10,
 55,
 30,
 0,
 25
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T41",
 "author": "@turcotalks",
 "emoji": "🛂",
 "text": "getting my irish passport renewed expeditiously",
 "estimation": "Signals policy attractiveness via citizenship action; playful but serious incentive pointer.",
 "coords": [
 55,
 5,
 -20,
 20,
 50,
 60,
 -10,
 40
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T42",
 "author": "@Bias_Zebra",
 "emoji": "💰❓",
 "text": "Who's paying the artists, and where is the return they're getting from?",
 "estimation": "Budget incidence and benefit flow question; demands concrete mechanism.",
 "coords": [
 45,
 60,
 50,
 10,
 5,
 40,
 0,
 70
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T43",
 "author": "@JackHates1Amend",
 "emoji": "📊",
 "text": "Median got a 40% return or the average?\n\nThe average probably would have 60% of people making  nothing and 40% of people making a huge profit",
 "estimation": "Distribution-aware skepticism; seeks statistical clarity (mean vs median, skew).",
 "coords": [
 50,
 70,
 55,
 5,
 -5,
 35,
 0,
 80
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T44",
 "author": "@TimK_VV",
 "emoji": "🤖",
 "text": "When AI takes most jobs, it will require adequate taxation of the extremely rich companies running the show, and widespread UBI, in my view, otherwise economies will collapse.",
 "estimation": "Macro-futurist argument for UBI; frames arts income as part of broader safety net.",
 "coords": [
 55,
 35,
 -30,
 10,
 90,
 55,
 -15,
 50
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T45",
 "author": "@aggresari0",
 "emoji": "💚",
 "text": "My beautiful Ireland! Absolutely phenomenal",
 "estimation": "Patriotic pride aligned with policy approval.",
 "coords": [
 65,
 -10,
 -30,
 25,
 70,
 75,
 25,
 35
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T46",
 "author": "@BuffaloBillScot",
 "emoji": "📚",
 "text": "Where is there more information about this?",
 "estimation": "Information-seeking; constructive engagement.",
 "coords": [
 75,
 55,
 10,
 20,
 35,
 70,
 0,
 75
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T47",
 "author": "@theegrandace",
 "emoji": "🌐",
 "text": "The way every nation would benefit from something like this",
 "estimation": "Generalizable claim of positive externalities; optimistic universalism.",
 "coords": [
 65,
 10,
 -40,
 15,
 85,
 70,
 -25,
 35
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T48",
 "author": "@Tronicai",
 "emoji": "🪙",
 "text": "Great, except for the implication that they wouldn't be doing it if it wasn't profitable",
 "estimation": "Critiques instrumentalization of art; worried about commodification logic dominating policy.",
 "coords": [
 35,
 45,
 -65,
 -5,
 30,
 30,
 0,
 55
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T49",
 "author": "@wack0prophe7",
 "emoji": "🧠🧮",
 "text": "I want some of this math",
 "estimation": "Sardonic request for methodology; implies skepticism of figures.",
 "coords": [
 15,
 60,
 60,
 -10,
 -15,
 -10,
 0,
 65
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
 "id": "T50",
 "author": "@accelereta42",
 "emoji": "🚫",
 "text": "No they didnt. Dont lie. Your mama Will be sad",
 "estimation": "Dismissive denial with ad hominem; tribal posture over evidence.",
 "coords": [
 -85,
 -30,
 20,
 -60,
 -70,
 -80,
 10,
 -45
 ],
 "replies_to": "T1"
 },
 {
    "id": "T3A",
    "author": "@LexerLux",
    "emoji": "🎯",
    "text": "Lmao you're the one who said it was profitable, my dude. Could you shift those goalposts any harder?",
    "estimation": "Adversarial correction with ridicule; frames lapislagoons as retreating from falsified claim, asserting logical consistency and accountability norms.",
    "coords": [-55, 80, 70, -35, -60, -65, 10, 50],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3B",
    "author": "@djw172",
    "emoji": "📏",
    "text": "Of course all value isn't monetary. What people are reasonably annoyed about is the dishonest way they pretended non-monetary value was actually monetary.",
    "estimation": "Balanced rational critique; affirms the philosophical premise but condemns rhetorical sleight of hand, defending epistemic integrity.",
    "coords": [20, 85, 45, 10, -20, 35, 0, 75],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3C",
    "author": "@ZbynekDrab",
    "emoji": "🧌",
    "text": "Nice bait and switch.\n\nI estimate my emotional harm from “artists” being paid for existing is $ 99999999999999999999999999999999989\n\nTherefore the policy should be abolished. Not all value is monetary. You have no possible counter",
    "estimation": "Aggressive parody; uses absurd exaggeration to mock subjective valuation and signal contempt for subsidized art.",
    "coords": [-85, 10, 60, -60, -80, -90, 35, -45],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3D",
    "author": "@tinkady2",
    "emoji": "🤨",
    "text": "Then what was the point of the study lmao \n\nJust assign the made up value",
    "estimation": "Dismissive rhetorical question; highlights methodological contradiction and perceived bad faith in framing.",
    "coords": [-40, 75, 65, -30, -55, -50, 0, 35],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3E",
    "author": "@lbuprofin",
    "emoji": "💸",
    "text": "I really really really love money so the most efficient way for you to organize your economy is to give it all to me. My enjoyment will 10x its value.",
    "estimation": "Ironically mirrors wellbeing valuation logic to satirize utilitarianism and expose perceived absurdity of 'psychological value'.",
    "coords": [-60, 40, 70, -40, -65, -60, 5, 25],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3F",
    "author": "@WesCS1",
    "emoji": "😏",
    "text": "Hell yeah not all value is monetary, but also not all compensation is deserved so send me some of those sweet Irish artbux tax dollars. I will provide hella value",
    "estimation": "Half-joking cynicism; acknowledges philosophical truth but undercuts it with self-aware greed and performative irony.",
    "coords": [-15, 20, 45, -25, -40, -10, 0, 10],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3G",
    "author": "@CommutationC",
    "emoji": "🧠",
    "text": "Money is just a metric for measuring value. If people aren't paying more, they don't feel there's more value. Saying not all value is money is like saying not all liquid is liters",
    "estimation": "Analytical rebuttal; collapses subjective value back into market-expressed value, asserting econometric realism.",
    "coords": [-25, 85, 80, -20, -55, 25, 0, 70],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3H",
    "author": "@rhodes_mzra",
    "emoji": "📊",
    "text": "But they study is literally putting a monetary value on their work. That is the entire point",
    "estimation": "Clarifies inconsistency; aims to expose internal contradiction between premise and defense.",
    "coords": [-20, 75, 65, -10, -35, 15, 0, 55],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3I",
    "author": "@malinformer",
    "emoji": "🎭",
    "text": "The position pays no money but offers a great amount of exposure and experience",
    "estimation": "Deadpan meme response referencing common exploitation trope; critiques unpaid creative labor systems.",
    "coords": [10, 40, -35, -15, 30, 45, 0, 25],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3J",
    "author": "@NadaPraVerAqui2",
    "emoji": "🤔",
    "text": "So, why tarnish that, making it monetary?",
    "estimation": "Philosophical query reversing premise; wonders if monetization corrupts authentic value.",
    "coords": [45, 30, -70, 20, 35, 60, 0, 55],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3K",
    "author": "@eom_mcd",
    "emoji": "💱",
    "text": "Then why are they quantifying it with money?",
    "estimation": "Logic-based question; exposes inconsistency between discourse of intrinsic value and empirical monetization.",
    "coords": [-10, 80, 70, -10, -40, 20, 0, 60],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3L",
    "author": "@eeephusss",
    "emoji": "💊",
    "text": "Let me know when we can start paying people in a currency called psychological wellbeing.",
    "estimation": "Sarcastic literalization mocking non-monetary valuation; weaponizes absurdism for ridicule.",
    "coords": [-70, 60, 75, -45, -70, -70, 10, 40],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3M",
    "author": "@xenoemoia",
    "emoji": "😶",
    "text": "remarkable",
    "estimation": "Ambiguously dry; could be genuine or ironic—serves as emotional punctuation more than argument.",
    "coords": [10, 0, 0, 10, 15, 20, 0, 5],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3N",
    "author": "@gunker1",
    "emoji": "🔁",
    "text": "Then went did you try and claim it was a monetary success?",
    "estimation": "Direct accusation of contradiction; interrogates rhetorical inconsistency.",
    "coords": [-25, 70, 55, -15, -45, -10, 0, 55],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3O",
    "author": "@LovesSardine",
    "emoji": "💀",
    "text": "Or maybe this is a made up sinecure at taxpayer expense.",
    "estimation": "Cynical populist angle; reframes as bureaucratic corruption and welfare for elites.",
    "coords": [-80, 50, 40, -45, -85, -70, 20, -25],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3P",
    "author": "@Doubledex124",
    "emoji": "🧠❌",
    "text": "You're not very bright, are you?",
    "estimation": "Pure ad hominem; displaces argument with insult, asserts dominance through contempt.",
    "coords": [-95, 0, 30, -55, -80, -95, 10, -60],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3Q",
    "author": "@Maxwell2515",
    "emoji": "🚮",
    "text": "Yeah it’s BS",
    "estimation": "Dismissive minimalism; signals in-group agreement with skepticism faction.",
    "coords": [-85, 5, 45, -40, -75, -70, 0, -35],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3R",
    "author": "@AllThingsAt0nce",
    "emoji": "🙃",
    "text": "You are so dumb lol. Thats literally what value is",
    "estimation": "Blunt ridicule; conflates concept of value with price to reassert market realism.",
    "coords": [-90, 40, 85, -50, -80, -85, 5, -25],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3S",
    "author": "@Orthogonite193",
    "emoji": "📉",
    "text": "Attaching numbers to your opinion doesn’t make it a statistic lmao.",
    "estimation": "Meta-epistemic dunk; defends scientific rigor while mocking pseudoquantification.",
    "coords": [-20, 85, 75, -10, -35, 15, 0, 65],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3T",
    "author": "@samktalksshit",
    "emoji": "🎭💥",
    "text": "You literally just said it monetary profitable then immediately back tracked when proven otherwise.\n\nJust admit you want free shit and get over it",
    "estimation": "Moralized accusation of hypocrisy and entitlement; fuses logical critique with class resentment.",
    "coords": [-80, 70, 60, -40, -90, -85, 25, -30],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3U",
    "author": "@c1e4n",
    "emoji": "🕵️‍♂️",
    "text": "ok but why lie tho?",
    "estimation": "Concise demand for honesty; moral framing over factual one.",
    "coords": [-45, 65, 50, -25, -60, -40, 0, 30],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  },
  {
    "id": "T3V",
    "author": "@TinyCrimps",
    "emoji": "🧾",
    "text": "lol then how did they put an £80MM valuation on it?",
    "estimation": "Pointed factual question leveraging the contradiction between claim and reported study.",
    "coords": [-25, 80, 70, -15, -45, -25, 0, 60],
    "replies_to": "T3"
  }
 ]
 }
No results found