Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@huttj

huttj/the_shamening.json

Last active October 2, 2025 03:21
Show Gist options

  • Select an option

    Learn more about clone URLs
  • Save huttj/ab695beadbc674071424c9f351620d89 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Learn more about clone URLs
Save huttj/ab695beadbc674071424c9f351620d89 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
Raw
the_shamening.json
{
"type": "complete",
"axes": [
{
"label": "Stated stance on public shaming",
"positive": "Opposes/condemns public shaming (preaches against it)",
"negative": "Supports/endorses or excuses public shaming"
},
{
"label": "Behavioral shaming in practice",
"positive": "Actively shames/ostracizes the OP in practice",
"negative": "De-escalates/avoids shaming, humanizes the OP"
}
],
"data": [
{
"id": "T0",
"author": "Katherine Everitt 💥",
"emoji": "📣",
"text": "I am begging the men of the world to be normal",
"estimation": "Public call-out framing; initiates shaming of a private DM.",
"coords": [
-80,
80
],
"replies_to": null
},
{
"id": "T1",
"author": "Aella",
"emoji": "⚖️",
"text": "This is cruel and you should feel bad and you're contributing to social norms where everyone feels terrified of honest harmless expression.",
"estimation": "Principled condemnation of shaming and its social effects, with a moral rebuke.",
"coords": [
85,
35
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T2",
"author": "Simon Sarris",
"emoji": "🤝",
"text": "Je suis Ivan",
"estimation": "Brief solidarity with the target; implicitly opposes shaming.",
"coords": [
70,
5
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T3",
"author": "taco belle",
"emoji": "🪞",
"text": "Yeah girl posting somebody’s DM to shame them instead of just not engaging is totalllyyyyy normal behavior. Ivan’s definitely the antisocial weirdo here, not you. Everybody should be so thin skinned, that’ll fix things",
"estimation": "Sarcastic critique of the call-out; mirrors the shaming dynamic back at OP.",
"coords": [
75,
45
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T4",
"author": "Guy HAS FINISHED WRITING THE BOOK (BETA)",
"emoji": "📉",
"text": "This was the fastest fall from grace I've ever seen. You just had to keep quiet. True hubris",
"estimation": "Harsh reputational condemnation; opposes the call-out while shaming OP.",
"coords": [
60,
70
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T5",
"author": "Guy HAS FINISHED WRITING THE BOOK (BETA)",
"emoji": "🗑️",
"text": "Delete ur account",
"estimation": "Pure ostracizing imperative; escalatory dogpile cue.",
"coords": [
50,
95
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T6",
"author": "moons",
"emoji": "🌙",
"text": "ivan is a cool dude he was just trying to make nerdy conversation with you",
"estimation": "Humanizing defense of the target; mild critique of shaming.",
"coords": [
60,
10
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T7",
"author": "active resonator",
"emoji": "🔍",
"text": "this is literally a demonstration of enough respect for your work to engage critically with it ???\n\n\ngirl,,,????",
"estimation": "Frames DM as respectful engagement; mildly condescending toward OP.",
"coords": [
65,
25
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T8",
"author": "Sebastian Ballister",
"emoji": "📰",
"text": "in which a woman who wrote an essay about AI and the nature of intelligence publicly shames a Midjourney researcher she met for reaching out politely to discuss her work, and expects this to be a \"public reckoning\" for him? x.com/katherineverit…",
"estimation": "Narrativizes the incident as public shaming; disapproving tone.",
"coords": [
75,
20
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T9",
"author": "Chris Lakin",
"emoji": "🧩",
"text": "Quote\nChris Lakin\n@ChrischipMonk\n·\nJul 6\nConflicts are soo fun and interesting, even beautiful. You get to see how the other person *really* is beneath any fascades. Are they really that chill? Conflicts are one of the best ways to learn about someone. You can trust them way more after",
"estimation": "Meta reflection on conflict; not directly about shaming.",
"coords": [
10,
0
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T10",
"author": "Anthony Castrio",
"emoji": "🧯",
"text": "+1 vouching for Ivan (know personally). He's clearly well intentioned here and has both good-character and a friendly nature.\n\nNow that the post is blowing up we should avoid dogpiling on Katherine (never met) and watch for crazies.",
"estimation": "Defends the target and explicitly discourages dogpiling; de-escalatory.",
"coords": [
90,
-40
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T11",
"author": "Anthony Castrio",
"emoji": "⚖️",
"text": "It's good we've developed an immune system against cancel culture.\n\nWe might need dampeners to prevent our new immune system from getting too aggressive, like an auto-immune disease attacks your own body.\n\nSweet spot ~kind/firm correction that draws no blood & holds no grudges. x.com/TylerAlterman/…",
"estimation": "Calls for calibrated correction over punitive shaming; anti-dogpile norm-setting.",
"coords": [
80,
-30
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T12",
"author": "Callan",
"emoji": "❓",
"text": "how is posting this in any way \"normal?\"",
"estimation": "Questions the normalization of the call-out; concise disapproval.",
"coords": [
65,
10
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T13",
"author": "charles (seacamp from oct 9-12, bali oct 2-19 🌴)",
"emoji": "🥶",
"text": "This is really mean",
"estimation": "Labels the act as mean; brief moral censure.",
"coords": [
70,
15
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T14",
"author": "PaulaGhete",
"emoji": "👏",
"text": "Everything about this is normal and fine. Maybe the problem here is what you expect and how you interact with people - including the way you decide to take screenshots of private, normal messages and post them online. To do what? Show that you lack basic decency? 👏",
"estimation": "Strong condemnation of posting private DMs; frames it as indecent.",
"coords": [
80,
50
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T15",
"author": "Georgina Dorothea 🧘‍♀️",
"emoji": "🕊️",
"text": "There is no need. Ivan was opening a discussion with you politely, with clear interest in your work. If it is the ‘normal’ to publicly attempt to shame someone over an honest attempt at starting dialogue, I opt out of that normal. \n\nI do not see the issue here",
"estimation": "Polite dissent; rejects shaming norm and re-centers dialogue.",
"coords": [
75,
5
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T16",
"author": "shoe",
"emoji": "🗡️",
"text": "he was trying to have a conversation with you and saw you as an intellectual peer. unfortunately he didn’t know you are just an evil jezebel and so now his punishment is being humilated and blasted on social media. sad!",
"estimation": "Defends target while heavily insulting OP; participates in pile-on.",
"coords": [
60,
85
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T17",
"author": "Lewis",
"emoji": "⚔️",
"text": "he treated you like an intellectual peer and engaged with your work. you were not capable of engaging on that level apparently and now publicly shame him without redacting his name. yet you are the only one who has acted shamefully.",
"estimation": "Accuses OP of inability and shameful conduct; moral counter-shaming.",
"coords": [
70,
80
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T18",
"author": "Daniel",
"emoji": "🛑",
"text": "Delete your account",
"estimation": "Maximal ostracizing imperative.",
"coords": [
55,
95
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T19",
"author": "HIGH PLANES Drifter",
"emoji": "🧱",
"text": ">the worst she can say is no\n\nShe tries to humiliate you when you engage with her as you would an intellectual peer",
"estimation": "Notes humiliation dynamic; disapproves without heavy invective.",
"coords": [
60,
20
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T20",
"author": "Jack Mars",
"emoji": "🧠",
"text": "Wait. What's the problem here? He read your thesis and had opinions about it. He seems interested in friendly debate. How is this \"abnormal\"?",
"estimation": "Reasoned challenge; frames DM as normal scholarly engagement.",
"coords": [
70,
5
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T21",
"author": "spor",
"emoji": "🧭",
"text": "this is pretty normal behavior and you come away looking like the poorly socialized one, i’m sorry to say\n\nif unwelcome, fine, but the normal response would have been to say so to him and have a conversation about it with him like an adult. publicizing it all is bizarre behavior.",
"estimation": "Normative guidance against publicizing; mild-to-moderate shaming.",
"coords": [
65,
30
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T22",
"author": "Collapse Enjoyer",
"emoji": "🧓",
"text": "You need to be younger and prettier to convincingly pull this move. At this age it just makes you look bitter and cruel.",
"estimation": "Ad hominem focused on appearance/age; strong shaming.",
"coords": [
40,
95
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T23",
"author": "apurveyor",
"emoji": "📵",
"text": "Posting this without censoring the person’s name/face also isn’t normal",
"estimation": "Targets the doxxing-like aspect; measured disapproval.",
"coords": [
70,
10
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T24",
"author": "cold 🥑",
"emoji": "💌",
"text": "\"I disagree with your thesis\" rizz is crazy. Not sure what he was thinking. Anyway I really agree with your thesis. DMs are open ❤️",
"estimation": "Playful flirt; largely sidesteps shaming issue.",
"coords": [
0,
-10
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T25",
"author": "signüll",
"emoji": "🚨",
"text": "what you're doing is horrible for society, have you thought about that?",
"estimation": "Societal harm framing; moralized condemnation.",
"coords": [
75,
45
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T26",
"author": "tomie",
"emoji": "🧊",
"text": "This is an oddly vindictive and mean-spirited way for you to act.",
"estimation": "Characterizes act as vindictive; controlled censure.",
"coords": [
70,
35
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T27",
"author": "snuppydogg",
"emoji": "🚫",
"text": "What is wrong with women",
"estimation": "Gendered generalization; redirects shaming broadly.",
"coords": [
20,
90
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T28",
"author": "divya venn",
"emoji": "🌱",
"text": "This is not a gender thing. This is about the selfish vs the selfless. People who are willing to look earnest, eager, maybe even a little silly, to create momentum where there isn’t any, to initiate the conversations and connections we all have too few of. \n \nMost of us are neutral in this regard. We respond well when people reach out, often wish it would happen more, but have too much embarrassment and inertia to do it themselves. \n\nWhen you actively SHAME people for being brave and interested, you’re actively worsening the loneliness epidemic.\n\nI am an easily discouraged person. It took me a long time to learn how to be happy go lucky in the face of rejection or indifference. I still don’t think I’m in a place where I’d be okay with being publicly shamed like this.\n\nI tell people to be open about what they want, to be reckless in showing curiosity and interest in things. That energy is what keeps the world vital. \n\nIf you don’t have it in you yet that’s okay! but for pity’s sake, don’t actively sabotage the people who do or who are trying to.",
"estimation": "Empathetic, systemic critique of shaming; urges pro-social norms.",
"coords": [
85,
-20
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T29",
"author": "marmot",
"emoji": "🦝",
"text": "you're the villain in this story",
"estimation": "Narrative inversion; blunt moral censure.",
"coords": [
60,
60
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T30",
"author": "TTL Inc",
"emoji": "💊",
"text": "I can tell from this post you're prescribed SSRI's.",
"estimation": "Personal attack; stigmatizing insinuation.",
"coords": [
30,
95
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T31",
"author": "Penniless Dick",
"emoji": "🗣️",
"text": "He tried to have a conversation with you…",
"estimation": "Simple defense of the target; mild critique of OP's reaction.",
"coords": [
55,
10
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T32",
"author": "hope hopes hoping",
"emoji": "🤨",
"text": "this is so weird lol. how can you study philosophy/think for a living and still be like this …",
"estimation": "Questions OP’s character/intellect; dismissive tone.",
"coords": [
50,
50
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T33",
"author": "_s.a.m.e.m.e.m.e_",
"emoji": "🧱",
"text": "Low-class behavior to post private messages with his face and name attached",
"estimation": "Class-labeled moral judgment of the act.",
"coords": [
60,
55
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T34",
"author": "CHLOÉ",
"emoji": "⛔",
"text": "Woman to woman, you’re retarded.",
"estimation": "Ableist slur; extreme personal shaming.",
"coords": [
40,
100
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T35",
"author": "critter",
"emoji": "🗑️",
"text": "she’s gonna delete this",
"estimation": "Predicts deletion; mildly mocking.",
"coords": [
25,
20
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T36",
"author": "th_l_t_d_ 🇺🇸",
"emoji": "🪓",
"text": "He was being normal and you're being a bitch. You're lucky he messaged you at all, frumpy peasant-faced wench.",
"estimation": "Explicit misogynistic insults; maximal pile-on.",
"coords": [
45,
100
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T37",
"author": "Covfefe Anon",
"emoji": "😏",
"text": "Clearly you're looking to get laid - my dms are open hmu - just drop the attitude\n\nI absolutely promise that we have no \"interests in common\" and the last \"decade of AI research\" will not come up in conversation",
"estimation": "Sexualized mockery; derisive tone toward OP.",
"coords": [
10,
80
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T38",
"author": "CrawD",
"emoji": "📋",
"text": "> guy reaches out in totally appropriate manner\n> gets right to engaging with your direct interests that he shares\n> opportunity for a friendly, low-stakes discussion\n> publicly shame him with his name included\n\nThe silver lining for him is that you saved him a lot of time by being so forthcoming with how mean-spirited you are.",
"estimation": "Structured critique ending in moral judgment.",
"coords": [
70,
30
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T39",
"author": "Noah Garver",
"emoji": "🫤",
"text": "Katherine that poor gentleman.",
"estimation": "Sympathy for target; mild reproach of OP.",
"coords": [
50,
10
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T40",
"author": "MJ",
"emoji": "👗",
"text": "your dress is beautiful queen but posting private DMs ain’t it :(",
"estimation": "Compliment sandwich; soft opposition to shaming.",
"coords": [
65,
5
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T41",
"author": "sucks",
"emoji": "⏳",
"text": "still time to delete this",
"estimation": "Urges deletion; mild dogpile cue.",
"coords": [
50,
40
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T42",
"author": "vittorio",
"emoji": "🤷",
"text": "His only fault was being a quirky nerdy boy \nYour loss",
"estimation": "Light defense of target with a dismissive jab.",
"coords": [
55,
10
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T43",
"author": "Robert Sterling",
"emoji": "🚪",
"text": "You should probably just delete your account and move over to Bluesky.",
"estimation": "Ostracizing suggestion; platform exile.",
"coords": [
45,
85
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T44",
"author": "the Rich",
"emoji": "🙅",
"text": "this ain’t it",
"estimation": "Concise disapproval; minimal heat.",
"coords": [
55,
20
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T45",
"author": "Yeerk.P 🦆",
"emoji": "💩",
"text": "Eat shit",
"estimation": "Pure insult; maximal shaming.",
"coords": [
20,
100
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T46",
"author": "Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)",
"emoji": "🚷",
"text": "you have no place in a polite society",
"estimation": "Explicit ostracization; gatekeeping social belonging.",
"coords": [
40,
95
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T47",
"author": "Chris",
"emoji": "🧭",
"text": "your social norms are bad and you should feel bad",
"estimation": "Normative critique with moral rebuke.",
"coords": [
65,
40
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T48",
"author": "Kristof",
"emoji": "🛡️",
"text": "bro dodged a bullet",
"estimation": "Protective framing of target; mild shaming of OP.",
"coords": [
45,
35
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T49",
"author": "divya venn",
"emoji": "✅",
"text": "He was being normal.",
"estimation": "Short, calm normalization of the target's behavior.",
"coords": [
70,
0
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T50",
"author": "kc",
"emoji": "📮",
"text": "This is being needlessly and extremely rude! What he did was normal and polite way of trying to converse with a stranger. You can always just not respond if you don’t want to engage with someone.",
"estimation": "Etiquette-based critique; suggests non-engagement as norm.",
"coords": [
70,
10
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T51",
"author": "anton 🇺🇸",
"emoji": "🧨",
"text": "do you think you could perhaps print this post out and pin it to yourself when out in public so people aren’t inadvertently exposed to the superfund site you carry around in your head tysm",
"estimation": "Vivid, demeaning insult; escalatory shaming.",
"coords": [
30,
100
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T52",
"author": "Bluesky Libs",
"emoji": "🥴",
"text": "Commentary account\nShame on him for not realizing you’re retarded.",
"estimation": "Targets both parties with insult; endorses shaming as a tactic.",
"coords": [
-40,
95
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T53",
"author": "Byronic Heroine",
"emoji": "🎓",
"text": "Isn’t it good that he’s taking your work seriously and also providing an alternative response? He seems really nice & sincerely interested in you & your ideas. This is messed up (not to mention a bunch of steps backward for your fellow female academics).",
"estimation": "Reasoned, values-based critique with intra-group concern.",
"coords": [
70,
15
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T54",
"author": "Chris",
"emoji": "🤷",
"text": "What did this guy do wrong here I don’t get it",
"estimation": "Asks for clarification; implicit defense of target.",
"coords": [
60,
0
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T55",
"author": "Physics Memes",
"emoji": "⚡",
"text": "You are a repugnant woman. Stop being evil. Imagine you see a possible future path with children and grandchildren with someone, so you write a thoughtful comment on one of his interests, and he responds by posting a picture of you and implying you have a foul-smelling vag.",
"estimation": "Highly inflammatory moral attack; extreme shaming.",
"coords": [
40,
100
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T56",
"author": "Leona",
"emoji": "🪞",
"text": "this is a perfectly normal and even friendly interaction between peers\n\ni would invite you to consider turning your gaze inward for a private reckoning",
"estimation": "Gentle reframing and suggestion of self-reflection.",
"coords": [
70,
10
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T57",
"author": "🎄Bones🎄",
"emoji": "🎭",
"text": "Wow you’re so beautiful strangers notice you& so popular it’s easy to find you on Twitter! So sad that you’re also so socially awkward you fumble a nice message from a nice young man. Perhaps your next educational venture could be charm school?",
"estimation": "Backhanded compliments with demeaning jab; shaming.",
"coords": [
20,
80
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T58",
"author": "DeeZe ⛳🏌️‍♂️",
"emoji": "🧮",
"text": "you are the one who is not normal here, miss karen everitt",
"estimation": "Labels OP abnormal; mild-to-moderate shaming.",
"coords": [
55,
50
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T59",
"author": "WBS",
"emoji": "🗯️",
"text": "Cunt",
"estimation": "Single-word sexist slur; maximal shaming.",
"coords": [
10,
100
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T60",
"author": "Shadz",
"emoji": "😤",
"text": "He’s trying to gave an actual conversation with you, good fucking lord.",
"estimation": "Exasperated defense of target; moderate shaming of OP.",
"coords": [
60,
25
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T61",
"author": "The Rabbit Hole",
"emoji": "🧹",
"text": "Low class and trashy behavior on your end.",
"estimation": "Classist moral condemnation.",
"coords": [
50,
80
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T62",
"author": "Sour Patch Lyds ن",
"emoji": "🧪",
"text": "He treated you as an intellectual equal and wanted to converse with you.\n\nYou treated him like dirt.\n\nHis only failure was his misjudgment of your IQ and humanity. All the rest was yours.",
"estimation": "Contrasts civility with OP's conduct; sharp indictment.",
"coords": [
60,
70
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T63",
"author": "𝐄𝐧𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐝 𝐃𝐨𝐨𝐦𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐫",
"emoji": "📏",
"text": "You’re about 8 points off being able to act like that and it be considered even moderately acceptable.",
"estimation": "Insulting gatekeeping based on perceived status/looks.",
"coords": [
35,
90
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T64",
"author": "Zy",
"emoji": "🫥",
"text": "Have you no shame?",
"estimation": "Moral rebuke in rhetorical question form.",
"coords": [
45,
40
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T65",
"author": "Cristine Rice",
"emoji": "🍑",
"text": "Damn this is wack, he should have just said you've got a spankable booty",
"estimation": "Crude joke; sidesteps core shaming issue.",
"coords": [
0,
0
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T66",
"author": "Shashi",
"emoji": "🧠",
"text": "He was being normal.\nHe was attempting to start an intelligent conversation with someone he shared a mutual interest with.\nThis is the most normal of normal human interactions that have ever existed.\nHis only mistake was thinking you were capable of having an intelligent conversation.",
"estimation": "Strong defense of target with a demeaning jab at OP.",
"coords": [
65,
70
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T67",
"author": "Astrid Wilde 🌞",
"emoji": "✅",
"text": "Ivan did nothing wrong",
"estimation": "Clear exoneration; minimal heat.",
"coords": [
60,
5
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T68",
"author": "Sarah Stock ✟",
"emoji": "🧩",
"text": "You’re weird for posting this",
"estimation": "Dismissive censure of the act; light insult.",
"coords": [
55,
40
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T69",
"author": "Dr. Shin Geon-yeong (神建永), Ph.D.",
"emoji": "🧪",
"text": "Woman who whines about her 200th dating failure while on a 6 dates per week prescheduled routine physiognomy",
"estimation": "Irrelevant personal smear; derogatory insinuation.",
"coords": [
20,
90
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T70",
"author": "Andrea D. Huberwoman, Ph.D.",
"emoji": "⏳",
"text": "Few years down the line you’ll be blaming men for why you’re single and childless.",
"estimation": "Predictive gendered insult.",
"coords": [
30,
80
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T71",
"author": "Fugitive Caesar",
"emoji": "😒",
"text": "you're not attractive enough to have a bad attitude",
"estimation": "Appearance-based insult; strong shaming.",
"coords": [
20,
95
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T72",
"author": "Zoomer Alcibiades",
"emoji": "🏛️",
"text": "Katherine Everitt would have immediately executed Socrates",
"estimation": "Hyperbolic historical jab; moral denunciation.",
"coords": [
30,
70
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T73",
"author": "William Coleman",
"emoji": "🧭",
"text": "The problem isn’t “men not being normal” here. He messaged you on Twitter, where your bio section lends one to believe you’re intelligent and enjoy philosophy, et cetera.\n\nHe tried to meet you on common ground with, what he thought, may be a stimulating conversation.\n\nIf you don’t want men to approach you like this, your signaling outwards is all wrong!",
"estimation": "Reasoned critique about signaling and expectations.",
"coords": [
65,
10
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T74",
"author": "alexandriabrown",
"emoji": "🤝",
"text": "This is normal behavior. In fact, this is polite.",
"estimation": "Affirms normalcy and politeness of the DM.",
"coords": [
70,
0
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T75",
"author": "Uncle 🤠",
"emoji": "💍",
"text": "You are over 20 without a husband \n\nYou lost life",
"estimation": "Misogynistic derision; unrelated to the incident.",
"coords": [
10,
95
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T76",
"author": "Ryan Gasoline",
"emoji": "🙇",
"text": "You're mean",
"estimation": "Simple moral censure.",
"coords": [
55,
40
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T77",
"author": "fudge",
"emoji": "🆓",
"text": "free ivan",
"estimation": "Concise solidarity with the target; anti-shaming cue.",
"coords": [
50,
5
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T78",
"author": "Ben Goldhaber",
"emoji": "🧱",
"text": "posting private DMs like this without censoring names/faces is really bad for social norms. It also sets the expectation that anyone who messages you privately can't trust that you won't publish it, which I think you'll regret.",
"estimation": "Norms-focused critique stressing trust and future costs.",
"coords": [
75,
5
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T79",
"author": "Mary",
"emoji": "💘",
"text": "This would be a dream meet cute for most women",
"estimation": "Reframes as a romantic/pleasant interaction; light critique.",
"coords": [
50,
10
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T80",
"author": "hyper(bolic) disco(unting) girl",
"emoji": "👍",
"text": "whats supposed to be wrong with this? also , ivan is cool 👍",
"estimation": "Dismisses the issue; endorses target.",
"coords": [
60,
5
],
"replies_to": "T0"
},
{
"id": "T81",
"author": "Cree",
"emoji": "🌤️",
"text": "i think you took this in a way that already assumes ill intent (not saying it's not) but honestly seems like he's just trying to have a debate / good chat! \n\nwe should always first assume the best of intentions in people or be lost to negativity forever",
"estimation": "Charitable interpretation; explicit pro-grace, anti-negativity norm.",
"coords": [
70,
-10
],
"replies_to": "T0"
}
]
}
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment