Note, this is not a suggestion for a global strategy for TAB, just a healthy way that our feature team can create clean, linear Pull Requests that are very easy to code review.
Create branch with feature name
- hack code
- rebase off master
| //container | |
| const mapDispatchToProps=(dispatch)=>{ | |
| return { | |
| createComment: async (trackId, commentText, cb)=>{ | |
| dispatch(createCommentAction(trackId, commentText)).then(cb); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
| # Bonus Bets - IMS, Wager Player, CRM Integration | |
| Note: I am unsure of the exact difference between offers and Bonuses terminology. I'm also unsure that the 'Trigger Criteria' in Ian Hogg's spreadsheet means the same thing as a Trigger in IMS. | |
| Reference: Ian Hogg's CRM Process List [here](https://tabcorp-digital.atlassian.net/ | |
| wiki/x/QACqAg) | |
| ## Process | |
| * 'Offers' will be entered into a CRM by Ian Hogg and Co. |
| var Animal = function(classification, legs_count, size) { | |
| this.classification = classification; | |
| this.legs_count = legs_count; | |
| this.size = size; | |
| } | |
| // An instance method; | |
| Animal.prototype.description = function(){ |