Test environment for std::ranges compile-time analysis.
| Property |
Value |
| OS |
Arch Linux (rolling) |
| Kernel |
6.17.9-arch1-1 |
| Architecture |
x86_64 |
| Kernel Config |
SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC |
| Build Date |
Mon, 24 Nov 2025 |
| Property |
Value |
| Model |
13th Gen Intel Core i5-13500 |
| Architecture |
x86_64 |
| Vendor |
GenuineIntel |
| Sockets |
1 |
| Cores per Socket |
14 (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) |
| Threads per Core |
2 |
| Total Threads |
20 |
| Base Frequency |
800 MHz |
| Max Turbo |
4800 MHz |
| Property |
Value |
| Total RAM |
32 GB |
| Type |
DDR4/DDR5 (system dependent) |
| Available |
~26 GB (at test time) |
| Property |
Value |
| Compiler |
Clang/LLVM |
| Version |
21.1.6 |
| Target Triple |
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |
| Thread Model |
posix |
| Property |
Value |
| Library |
libstdc++ (GNU) |
| Version |
15.2.1 |
| GCC Version |
15.2.1 20251112 |
| Header Path |
/usr/include/c++/15.2.1/ |
clang++ -std=c++20 -O2 -ftime-trace -c <file>.cpp -o <file>.o
| Flag |
Purpose |
-std=c++20 |
Enable C++20 standard (required for <ranges>) |
-O2 |
Optimization level 2 (production-like optimization) |
-ftime-trace |
Generate Chrome trace JSON for compile-time analysis |
-c |
Compile only (no linking) |
-std=c++20: Required for std::ranges, std::views, and C++20 concepts
-O2: Representative of real-world builds; enables inlining and optimizations that affect ranges performance
-ftime-trace: Clang's built-in profiler for compile-time analysis; outputs JSON in Chrome Trace Format
# No special environment variables set for compilation
# Using system defaults
| Property |
Value |
| Test Directory |
/tmp/ranges/ |
| Filesystem |
tmpfs (RAM-backed) |
| I/O Impact |
Minimal (memory-speed I/O) |
OS: Arch Linux (kernel 6.17.9)
Compiler: clang++ 21.1.6
Stdlib: libstdc++ 15.2.1 (GCC 15.2.1)
Standard: C++20
To reproduce this analysis:
# 1. Install dependencies (Arch Linux)
sudo pacman -S clang gcc
# 2. Create test files (see report.md Appendix B)
# 3. Compile with tracing
clang++ -std=c++20 -O2 -ftime-trace -c single_loop.cpp -o single_loop.o
clang++ -std=c++20 -O2 -ftime-trace -c single_ranges.cpp -o single_ranges.o
# 4. Analyze JSON traces
# Open .json files in chrome://tracing or use Python scripts
- Clang 21.1.6 is a bleeding-edge version; results may vary with older compilers
- libstdc++ 15.2.1 provides the
<ranges> implementation being tested
- Compile times are measured on a high-performance desktop; results scale with CPU speed
- Tests run on tmpfs eliminate disk I/O as a variable
Platform specification for std::ranges compile-time analysis
not reviewed yet:
"""
Comprehensive Analysis: std::ranges Compile-Time Cost
Report Generated from clang++ -ftime-trace
Compiler: clang++ with -std=c++20 -O2
Date: 2024
Table of Contents
1. Executive Summary
KEY FINDING:
std::rangesincurs a ~267ms FIXED compile-time tax per translation unit, with only ~5ms marginal cost per additional pipeline.Cost Breakdown
Key Metrics
#include <ranges>)2. Test Files Description
single_loop.cppsingle_ranges.cppmulti_ranges.cppbig_loop.cppbig_ranges.cpp3. Methodology
Data Collection
Output:
<file>.json(Chrome trace format)Trace Event Types Analyzed
Source(cat)ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinitionParseClassInstantiateClassInstantiateFunction*PassTotal *4. Raw Measurements
Compilation Times
Derived Metrics
<ranges>overhead)5. Header Analysis
5.1 Header Inclusion Comparison
5.2 Headers Unique to
<ranges>5.3 Header Dependency Chain
<ranges>includes (directly or transitively):6. Template Instantiation Analysis
6.1 Class Instantiations - single_ranges.cpp
std::reverse_iterator<std::_Bit_iterator>std::reverse_iterator<std::_Bit_const_iterator>std::ranges::filter_view<std::ranges::ref_view<const std::vector<int>>...std::iterator_traits<std::ranges::filter_view<std::ranges::ref_view<...std::ranges::filter_view<std::ranges::transform_view<std::ranges::tr...std::basic_string<char>std::basic_string<char32_t>std::basic_string<char16_t>std::basic_string<wchar_t>std::basic_string<char8_t>std::ranges::transform_view<std::ranges::filter_view<std::ranges::re...std::ranges::transform_view<std::ranges::transform_view<std::ranges:...std::vector<int>6.2 Function Instantiations - single_ranges.cpp
std::ranges::filter_view<...>::filter_viewstd::ranges::__access::_Begin::operator()<std::ranges::filter_view<...std::ranges::filter_view<std::ranges::ref_view<const std::vector<int>>...std::basic_string<wchar_t>::_M_construct<const char *>std::basic_string<wchar_t>::_S_copy_chars<const char *>std::ranges::__find_if_fn::operator()<std::ranges::transform_view<st...std::ranges::__find_if_fn::operator()<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<c...6.3 Ranges-Specific View Instantiations
6.4 View Type Nesting Analysis
The ranges pipeline
filter | transform | transform | filtercreates this nested type:filter_view< transform_view< transform_view< filter_view< ref_view<vector<int>>, lambda#1 // single_ranges.cpp:8:28 >, lambda#2 // single_ranges.cpp:9:31 >, lambda#3 // single_ranges.cpp:10:31 >, lambda#4 // single_ranges.cpp:11:28 >Each view adapter adds another layer of template nesting.
6.5 View Instantiation Details (with exact source locations)
filter_view<ref_view<vector<int>>, λ>single_ranges.cpp:8:28transform_view<filter_view<...>, λ>single_ranges.cpp:9:31transform_view<transform_view<...>, λ>single_ranges.cpp:10:31filter_view<transform_view<...>, λ>single_ranges.cpp:11:287. Optimizer Pass Analysis
7.1 Top Optimizer Passes - single_ranges.cpp
ModuleInlinerWrapperPassModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptorDevirtSCCRepeatedPassPassManager<LazyCallGraph::SCC, ...>CodeGenPassesCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptorPassManager<Function>ModuleToFunctionPassAdaptorDevirtSCCRepeatedPassPassManager<LazyCallGraph::SCC, ...>7.2 Optimizer Overhead Comparison
The optimizer must work harder on ranges code because:
8. Cost Model Derivation
8.1 Fixed Cost Analysis
Comparing
single_loop.cppvssingle_ranges.cpp:8.2 Marginal Cost Analysis
Comparing
single_ranges.cpp(1 pipeline) vsmulti_ranges.cpp(4 pipelines):8.3 Final Cost Model
Where:
T_baseline= 125ms (compiling equivalent loop code)T_fixed= 267ms (first use of<ranges>)T_marginal= 5.2ms (each additional pipeline)Validation
9. Conclusions & Recommendations
9.1 Key Findings
HEADER PARSING DOMINATES (58% of overhead)
<ranges>pulls in 43 additional headers<optional>,<span>,<tuple>,<string_view>...VIEW MACHINERY IS REASONABLE (15% of overhead)
filter_view+transform_viewinstantiation: ~40msMARGINAL COST IS LOW (~5ms per pipeline)
OPTIMIZER OVERHEAD IS MODEST (8% of overhead)
9.2 Recommendations
USE RANGES WHEN:
AVOID RANGES WHEN:
9.3 Mitigation Strategies
PRECOMPILED HEADERS
<ranges>in PCHFORWARD DECLARATIONS
#include <ranges>in headersMODULE SYSTEM (C++20)
import std;orimport std.ranges;Appendix A: Source File References
A.1 Parse Events with File:Line
Events from
ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinitionwith duration >500μs:single_ranges.cpp:5:1type_traits:68:1bits/max_size_type.h:61:5stdlib.h:34:1bits/basic_string.h:5003:5bits/basic_string.h:5008:5bits/max_size_type.h:442:5bits/basic_string.h:4997:5system_error:558:3bits/basic_string.h:4813:3bits/basic_string.h:4453:3bits/basic_string.h:4529:3stdio.h:30:1bits/basic_string.h:4724:3bits/ios_base.h:265:3pthread.h:197:1new:56:1compare:663:5bits/locale_classes.h:559:3A.2 Full View Type Signatures
Appendix B: Source Code
see above.
Appendix C: Data Files
Trace Files Generated
/tmp/ranges/single_loop.json/tmp/ranges/single_ranges.json/tmp/ranges/multi_ranges.json/tmp/ranges/big_loop.json/tmp/ranges/big_ranges.jsonObject Files
single_loop.osingle_ranges.omulti_ranges.obig_loop.obig_ranges.oSummary
The
std::rangeslibrary provides elegant, composable pipelines but comes with a measurable compile-time cost:Bottom line: For projects with many pipelines or using PCH, the cost is amortized and acceptable. For header-only libraries or small utilities, traditional loops may be preferable.
Report generated using clang++ -ftime-trace analysis
"""