In-class reference for Session 1 (Tue) + Session 2 (Thu)
Time: 75 min | Date: Tue, Jan 27, 2:00 PM
- Collect handwritten notes at door (3 points participation)
- Return notes after collection so students can use them
- Preview: "Today = frameworks. Thursday = debate."
Framework for analyzing industry attractiveness — not firm strength.
| Force | Question | High = Bad for Profits |
|---|---|---|
| Threat of New Entrants | How easy to enter? | Low barriers → more competition |
| Supplier Power | Can suppliers dictate terms? | Few suppliers → leverage |
| Buyer Power | Can customers dictate terms? | Concentrated buyers → price pressure |
| Threat of Substitutes | Alternative products? | Many substitutes → price ceiling |
| Rivalry | How intense is competition? | Many similar firms → margin erosion |
Key insight: Industry structure determines average profitability.
IT connection: Technology shifts forces — e-commerce lowers entry barriers, platforms increase buyer power through transparency.
Cold call prompts:
- "Draw Five Forces on the board and explain each."
- "Rate the forces for airlines. Which is strongest?"
- "How has the internet changed buyer power?"
Framework for firm-level advantage. What makes this firm outperform rivals?
| Criterion | Question | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Valuable | Exploit opportunities / neutralize threats? | Zara's POS data → responds to trends faster |
| Rare | Do few competitors have it? | Proprietary algorithms, unique supplier relationships |
| Inimitable | Costly/difficult to copy? | Complex processes, tacit knowledge, path dependence |
| Non-substitutable | No equivalent resource? | Can't replicate with different approach |
Key insight: Must pass ALL FOUR for sustainable advantage.
Why resources fail:
- Valuable but common → Competitive parity
- Rare but imitable → Temporary advantage
- Can be substituted → Alternative achieves same result
IT implication: Tech alone rarely passes VRIN. Hardware/software can be bought. The combination of tech + processes + culture + skills is hard to copy.
Cold call prompts:
- "What does VRIN stand for? Why does each matter?"
- "Is Amazon's logistics network VRIN? Test each criterion."
- "What's the difference between rare and inimitable?"
Framework for where value is created within a firm.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SUPPORT ACTIVITIES │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Firm Infrastructure (finance, planning, legal) │
│ Human Resource Management │
│ Technology Development │
│ Procurement │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ PRIMARY ACTIVITIES │
├──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬────────────────────┤
│ Inbound │ │ Outbound │Marketing │ │
│ Logistics│Operations│ Logistics│ & Sales │ Service │
└──────────┴──────────┴──────────┴──────────┴────────────────────┘
→ MARGIN
Primary: Inbound → Operations → Outbound → Marketing & Sales → Service
Support: Infrastructure, HR, Technology Development, Procurement
Key insight: Advantage comes from performing activities differently or performing different activities.
Cold call prompts:
- "Walk us through the primary activities with examples."
- "Where does IT touch the value chain? Which activities?"
- "What's the difference between Technology Development and Operations?"
| Force | Zara's Position |
|---|---|
| New Entrants | High barriers — speed requires massive vertical integration investment |
| Supplier Power | Low — Zara owns production |
| Buyer Power | Moderate — urgency ("buy now or miss out") reduces power |
| Substitutes | Many alternatives, but Zara's speed is unique |
| Rivalry | Intense — but Zara competes on speed, not price |
| Resource/Capability | V | R | I | N | Sustainable? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POS systems | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | No — anyone can buy |
| Real-time demand data | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | Partial |
| 2-week design-to-store | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | YES |
| Vertical integration + IS | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | YES |
Key insight: It's the system of interconnected capabilities that's inimitable, not any single technology.
| Activity | How IS Enables It |
|---|---|
| Inbound Logistics | Supplier coordination, fabric inventory |
| Operations | CAD systems, automated cutting, scheduling |
| Outbound Logistics | Centralized distribution, 2x weekly shipments |
| Marketing & Sales | POS data, store manager feedback systems |
| Technology Development | Proprietary systems connecting all activities |
Discussion prompts:
- "Which of Zara's resources truly pass VRIN? Defend your answer."
- "Why can't H&M or Gap just copy Zara's systems?"
- "Is Zara's advantage from technology or something else?"
Preview Thursday:
- Position assignments posted on Canvas
- Read Carr's "IT Doesn't Matter" article
- Complete AI debate (4+ exchanges)
- Submit position paper by Wed 11:59 PM
- Come ready to defend your assigned position
Time: 75 min | Date: Thu, Jan 29, 2:00 PM
- Display pairing list on screen
- Students find their debate partner
- 2 min prep with partner to agree on ground rules
Carr's core claims:
- IT has become ubiquitous — everyone has access
- IT is now infrastructure (like electricity) — necessary but not differentiating
- Spending more on IT doesn't improve performance
- Companies should focus on cost reduction and risk management
- It's how you use it — execution and integration matter
- First-mover advantages — early adopters build switching costs
- IT enables business model innovation — platforms, data, ecosystems
- Continuous innovation required — standing still = falling behind
- Carr conflates hardware with capabilities — buying servers ≠ building systems
Both sides have merit:
- Commodity IT (email, ERP, basic analytics) → Carr is right, no advantage
- Strategic IT (proprietary systems, data assets, platforms) → Differentiation possible
The real question: "Which IT matters and how?"
| Round | Time | Format |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 min | Debate assigned partner |
| 2 | 10 min | Rotate — find new opponent from other side |
| 3 | 10 min | Final rotation OR deeper dive with current |
Logistics (21 students):
- 11 "IT Does Matter" vs 10 "IT Does NOT Matter"
- 10 pairs + 1 trio (or instructor debates odd student)
Facilitation tips:
- Circulate but don't intervene
- If pair finishes early: "What about the AI industry?"
- Note strong arguments to call on during synthesis
Opening questions:
- "What was the strongest argument you heard from the other side?"
- "Did anyone change their mind?"
- "Has Carr's argument aged well since 2003? What's changed?"
Push for nuance:
- "When does IT matter? Under what conditions?"
- "Is the answer different for different industries?"
- "What about AI — does that change the calculus?"
Connect to Zara:
- "Does IT matter for Zara specifically?"
- "How would Carr respond to Zara as an example?"
- "What separates companies where IT matters from those where it doesn't?"
-
IT as commodity vs. capability — The tech itself may be commodity; how you use it isn't
-
Complementary assets matter — Technology + processes + culture + skills
-
Timing matters — First movers can build advantages before others catch up
-
Industry context matters — IT matters more in some industries than others
-
2003 vs. 2026 — Cloud, AI, platforms have changed the equation
-
Zara's lesson — The whole system is greater than the sum of its parts
Connect to frameworks:
- Five Forces: How does IT shift industry dynamics?
- RBV/VRIN: When does IT pass the test?
- Value Chain: Where does IT create the most value?
Preview Week 3:
- Case Memo #1: Zara (due end of Week 3)
- Start identifying which IS capabilities pass VRIN
- Think about what a competitor would need beyond technology
Reminders:
- Five Forces Lab due Sunday 11:59 PM
- GenAI Module 1 due end of Week 3 (self-paced)
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| "Which position is right?" | Both have merit — the answer is "it depends" |
| "Can I use same company for lab and project?" | Yes, encouraged |
| "What if I agree with the opposite position?" | Good! Defending positions you disagree with builds argumentation skills |
| "Did I have to agree with my assigned side?" | No, but you had to argue it convincingly |
- Pairing list displayed/printed
- Timer visible for debate rounds
- Whiteboard markers (for framework diagrams)
- Five Forces template handout (optional)
Last Updated: 2026-01-28