Privacy Policy for Habituality
Last updated: January 4, 2026
Habituality does not collect, store, or transmit any personal information. All your habit tracking data is stored locally on your device and never leaves it.
Data Storage
| #!/usr/bin/env node | |
| const { realioNetworkToEth, ethToRealionetwork } = require('@realiotech/address-generator'); | |
| // Get the address from command line arguments | |
| const address = process.argv[2]; | |
| if (!address) { | |
| console.error('Error: Please provide an address as a command line argument'); | |
| console.error('Usage: node address-converter.js <address>'); |
| Tweet #1: https://twitter.com/yojoots/status/1225313674631503872 | |
| "The obvious counter is a PoW algorithm swapout. All who have a stake in BTC have commensurate incentive to follow the functional side of the fork." | |
| The point: if a party has any stake in BTC, they have commensurate incentive to follow along on the branch of any given fork that continues to function. | |
| Tweet #2: https://twitter.com/evoskuil/status/1225352981811347458 | |
| "Nope." (link to https://github.com/libbitcoin/libbitcoin-system/wiki/Proof-of-Work-Fallacy) | |
| From the included link: "There is a theory that mining services are subservient... According to this theory miners then suffer a catastrophic loss due to the unrecoverable capital investment in highly-specialized hardware." | |
| Note: this link, and the reasoning it contains, is not relevant to the point raised in Tweet #1. In fact, Tweet #1 does *not* argue in any way that users can "foist a capital loss" on miners. The link is entirely irrelevant to Tweet #1 and the point that it makes. In othe |