Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@TravnikovDev

TravnikovDev/hot-take-in-2025-a-sharp-video-editor-is-more-defensible-than-an-average-coder.md

Created December 9, 2025 13:32
Show Gist options

  • Select an option

    Learn more about clone URLs
  • Save TravnikovDev/e882640ccb4368a6c6ae9ca52ad3fa5f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.

Select an option

Learn more about clone URLs
Save TravnikovDev/e882640ccb4368a6c6ae9ca52ad3fa5f to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Download ZIP
LinkedIn Post - 2025-12-09 08:32
Raw
hot-take-in-2025-a-sharp-video-editor-is-more-defensible-than-an-average-coder.md

Hot take: in 2025, a sharp video editor is more defensible than an average coder. Code is getting auto-filled. Taste isn’t.

I told a friend - a killer editor - to start a YouTube channel. He shrugged, said “AI will replace me.” Nah. Not the parts that matter.

I had my AI research agent pull receipts. Yes, there are tools that auto-cut and assemble videos - beat sync, captions, reframes, even rough montages from a messy camera roll. They’re real and useful. But most of them are power tools, not autopilots.

The pro stuff - Premiere, Resolve, Final Cut - now handle the boring grind. Transcribe and edit by text. Kill dead air. Auto-captions and translations. Clean ugly audio. Reframe for vertical. Fit music to length. It turns a 6-hour slog into an afternoon. But it still asks you the hard questions: which shot sells the feeling, when do we breathe, what’s the payoff.

There is one place where true automation already wins - sports highlights. WSC Sports chews live games and spits out polished clips in seconds for big leagues. It works because the world is structured - goals, whistles, scoreboards. That’s the exception, not the template for your brand film or a founder story.

Consumer side is sneaky strong too. GoPro Quik and CapCut templates will give you “cool edit” energy from a pile of clips - perfect for birthday reels and fast social posts. Great for speed. Not your brand’s soul.

The catch - one-click edits look like one-click edits. They cut laughs in half. They miss tension. And the admin still bites - music rights can nuke your upload, some tools upload footage to the cloud, and auto captions are confident and wrong at least once per minute.

Will AI replace editors in five years? No. It will bulldoze the repetitive parts and reward the editors who learn to drive it. The job shifts from timeline janitor to story architect.

If you edit, here’s the unfair advantage play:

  • Cut by transcript first. Let AI find the beats, you decide the moments.
  • Use a silence cutter to get a rough cut, then you sculpt.
  • Repurpose long videos into shorts with a clipper tool, curate the best, add your flavor.
  • Build a template library so your “fast” still looks like you. Ship more without shipping garbage. 🎬

Editors - what did AI actually take off your plate, and what do you still guard with your life?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment